toggle

AAPL Stock: 112.01 ( -0.53 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

Judge puts Psystar suit on track for January trial

updated 01:45 pm EDT, Mon July 13, 2009

Apple lawsuit continues

Apple's licensing infringement lawsuit against Psystar is progressing again, with the trial now scheduled for January 11, 2010. The proceedings had been delayed due to Psystar's bankruptcy filing, which the company recently moved to drop after the Florida court decided the Apple suit would still be allowed to continue.

The infringement lawsuit centers around Psystar's pre-installation of Mac OS X software onto non-Apple PCs. Apple contends that the process of bypassing the software's built-in protections against installs on non-Apple products is a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Psystar has filed a counterclaim that accuses Apple of overextending the copyright protection.

The lawsuit's discovery deadline is August 21, with replies due two weeks later. Any pre-trial motions must be filed by October 8 and there is a pre-trial conference scheduled for December 14th.

There is an interesting note in the case -- due to Psystar's bankruptcy filing, payments to its legal team must be reported in the bankruptcy court, where Apple is considered a creditor and therefore privy to the information. This information could expose any individuals or companies that Apple believes are secretly assisting the clone maker.




by MacNN Staff

POST TOOLS:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. zimbardo

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +2

    Dark Money

    I knew there was dark money behind Psystar because no individual without deep pockets would do something so blatantly illegal.

  1. malax

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    2010?

    Justice sure is swift...

  1. manleycreative

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    ...

    Kill 'em for me Marv, kill 'em good!

  1. LouZer

    Joined: Dec 1969

    -2

    Re: Dark Money

    I knew there was dark money behind Psystar because no individual without deep pockets would do something so blatantly illegal.

    And what is substantiating this belief of yours? The vague paragraph at the bottom that would inform someone of the money behind the company?

    Oh, and since they dropped their bankruptcy filing, why would they still have to file information to the bankruptcy court?

  1. manleycreative

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +1

    Et tu, brute?

    OMG, LouZer is so totally on you Zim! He can haz him some college degreez. Ha!

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Dell AD211 Bluetooth speaker

For all of the high-priced, over-engineered Bluetooth speakers in the electronics market, there is still room for mass-market solution ...

VisionTek 128GB USB Pocket SSD

USB flash drives dealt the death blow to both the floppy and Zip drives. While still faster than either of the old removable media, sp ...

Kodak PixPro SL10 Smart Lens Camera

Smartphone imagery still widely varies. Large Megapixel counts don't make for a good image, and the optics in some devices are lackin ...

toggle

Most Commented