toggle

AAPL Stock: 432 ( + 1.95 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/09/04/24/apple.loses.1600.at.retail/

Apple axes 1,600 full-time retail positions

updated 09:50 am EDT, Fri April 24, 2009

 

Apple loses 1600 at retail


Apple's increased retail revenue in the second fiscal quarter came at the expensive of many people's jobs, SEC filings reveal. While the company managed to push retail revenue from $1.45 billion in Q208 to $1.47 billion in Q209, documents show that the company employed only 14,000 people in stores full-time. During the first fiscal quarter of the 2009, the company was using 15,600 full-time workers.

The fate of the missing 1,600 employees is uncertain, but may be connected reports from late 2008, which suggested that Apple -- knowing a recession was looming -- had the intention of reducing hours available to part-time workers. The SEC filing refers specifically to people working the equivalent of full-time, which could include nominally part-time employees who take extra hours.

Cuts may have been precipitated by figures such as a declining average revenue per store, which fell to $5.9 million in Q209 from $7.1 million in Q208. Apple also chose to open 45 new stores during 2008, imposing logistical and real estate burdens meant to be supported by healthier economies. The company is nevertheless planning to open a total of 25 new stores in FY09.


by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 retail, Apple
toggle

Comments

  1. Roehlstation

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    +8

    Seasonal?

    Or perhaps those employees were only brought in for the holiday season...

  1. greenG4

    Grizzled Veteran

    Joined: Aug 2002

    +1

    Re: Seasonal?

    That would make too much sense. Then there's nothing to "analyze".

  1. Eldernorm

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2007

    +1

    Steve... stop that

    Steve... Steve Ballmer, Are you writing these articles again? LOL

    Please, as a big time CEO, you should spend your time more efficiently, like making Windows better, or cheaper or something..... anything.... except increasing the Seattle chair mfg marketplace. :-)

    Just a thought,
    en

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    fate?

    The fate of the missing 1,600 employees is uncertain,

    Well I think it's obvious. Their plane crashed on some deserted island (or is it????) in the middle of the pacific.

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -6

    fate?

    The fate of the missing 1,600 employees is uncertain,

    Well I think it's obvious. Their plane crashed on some deserted island (or is it????) in the middle of the pacific.

  1. gramos

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2008

    +4

    Axes?

    ...and the "missing" jobs could not have been due to attrition? "Apple axes 1,600" jobs is an overstatement...

  1. gramos

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2008

    0

    Axes?

    ...and the "missing" jobs could not have been due to attrition? "Apple axes 1,600" jobs is an overstatement...

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -12

    Re: seasonal

    It isn't seasonal. You don't hire full-time employees seasonally, because full-time employees get benefits and other fun stuff that part-timers don't get.

    Plus, the article states they were cutting down on part-timer's hours in November. If you were going to increase your workforce for the season, why would you cut your part-time hours?

    Oh, and did you realize that Apple's profits came at the "expensive" of people's jobs? So it didn't cost people jobs. Just the expensive jobs.

  1. sith33

    Junior Member

    Joined: Feb 2003

    +5

    Uhh, no they didn't

    You're missing the word "equivalent" - IE, they may have reduced hours for part time workers, etc. So, reduce 4 part time people by 10hrs/week, it's the equivalent of cutting one FTE.

  1. ff11

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2004

    +3

    Re: seasonal

    Another gem from Testudo. Given that they allegedly let go of 1600 people during the year, and their profits were in the neighborhood of >$4-5 Billion, those 1600 employees would have to average over $2.5 million a year in salary and benefits for you to be able to claim "Apple's profits came at the "expensive" of people's jobs".

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Logitech FabricSkin Keyboard Folio for iPad

Since the fourth-generation iPad didn't evolve much over its predecessor, the market for iPad accessories has remained somewhat static ...

Huawei Ascend Mate

The Huawei Ascend Mate is a phone that fits the screen-size gap between the 4 to 5-inch smartphone and the seven-inch or more tablet, ...

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

toggle

Most Commented