Text Size

Internet Safety Act could affect home Wi-Fi users

updated 11:25 pm EST, Sun February 22, 2009

Home Wi-Fi users affected?

Two Texas-based US representatives have introduced bills that would require ISPs to store user information for two years. The bills may even require home wi-fi router users to track the same information, according to Macworld. The bills were introduced Thursday, one in the US Senate, by Rep. Senator John Cornyn, and in the House by Representative Lamar Smith. Each bill is called the Internet Safety Act, aimed at preventing child pornography via the Internet. The bills call for stronger penalties for accessing child pornography on the Internet and would require Internet and e-mail service providers to retain all records and related information about anyone using a network address temporarily assigned by the service.

Retention would apply to any provider of “an electronic communication service or remote computing service,” as well as someone who receives the content and recipient list of e-mail messages that it “transmits, receives, or stores,” according to the text of the Senate bill. Cornyn and Smith said the law would require ISPs to hold on to subscriber records similar to those retained by telecommunications carriers. ISPs today are required to preserve any information related to specific communications on their networks that are involved in a criminal investigation for 90, which can be renewed for as much as six months to obtain a court order to seize the information as evidence.

The Internet Safety Act would order service providers to store personal information about their customers simply on the chance they are later accused of a crime. Depending on the interpretation of the new bills, private citizens and enterprises with wireless networks, even those with password-protection, would need hard drives to store data on every user who utilizes on the network.
The bills are currently limited to Republican support at a time when Democrats control the House and Senate, so expectations are for failure of the bill.

 
Previous Comments

TX Republicans

02/23, 05:43am (1 reply) reply

What is it with the Republican party that they feel this need to constantly try to compromise privacy?

SierraDragon

Mac Elite

Joined: Mar 2004

+8

JulesLt

02/23, 07:18am (2 replies) reply

I suspect a small SD card could probably keep a record of every connection to a home WiFi network over a 2 year period - but it does open an interesting prospect of making existing equipment illegal.

JulesLt

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jul 2005

+5

Nothing better to do?

02/23, 08:31am reply

These legislators have so much time on their hands now that the economic problems of the country are all solved that they have time to regulate this critical issue.

Texas voters, remember these guys.


jfelbab

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jan 2004

+6

but...

02/23, 09:34am reply

"Won't somebody please think of the children!"

If this is their intent for the law, I'd like to see an amendment, then, that would require (a) a public search warrant to retrieve the data, and (b) limitations such that only crimes of child pornography are allowed. No "Well, we think we have a terrorist" or "Hey, check it out, I think I found someone illegally sharing a song!"

LouZer

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Nov 2000

+1

a criminal investigation.

02/23, 10:03am reply

....FOR 90 WHAT ?

MacNN ?

UberFu

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Oct 2002

-2

Techno-clueless

02/23, 10:27am reply

Politicians are so clueless when it comes to technology.

Mr. Strat

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jan 2002

+3

Time

02/23, 10:56am reply

to buy more stock in the hard drive manufactures and database keepers. "Um, yeah, we'd like you to retain everything that happens on the Internet for two years, and um we'd like to search it all."

sailin74

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2002

+1

Privacy Issue!!! Costs?

02/23, 11:08am reply

This is actually the most ridiculous idea that would cost everyone a lot of money!!!

b9robot

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Feb 2009

0

Wingnuts

02/23, 11:42am reply

Nothing but wingnut posturing. "The Democrat party hates the children".

boris_cleto

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Sep 2002

+3

Hypocrites

02/23, 11:48am reply

I just love politicians on both sides of the aisles. Conservatives have no problem coming up with ways to violate people's privacy out of "concern" for security and the moral character of the country, but start talking about background checks and registration requirements for guns, and it's all of a sudden a constitutional issue. (I guess since the constitution prohibits "illegal search AND seizure", as long as they either search or seize, it's OK).

And the democrats. Oh, don't get me started...

testudo

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2001

0

Popular News