toggle

AAPL Stock: 439.66 ( 0 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/08/12/30/iphone.use.during.xmas/

iPhone browser use rises 35.7 percent Christmas week

updated 02:25 pm EST, Tue December 30, 2008

 

iPhone use during Xmas


Adding to recent iPod figures, new data suggests that the iPhone sold well throughout the Christmas shopping season as well. During the week of Christmas, iPhone browser share is said to have risen 35.7 percent over the week before, reaching 0.57 percent of all browser use. This figure is also more than 50 percent higher than the average iPhone share in November, which was 0.37 percent.

The surge in use is being generally attributed to people receiving iPhones for the first time, although it may also be reflective of more spare time for existing owners, and/or less time and inclination to use a computer's browser. Evidence for high sales comes mainly from a dramatic rise in activity at the App Store, and anecdotal sightings of increased ownership.


by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 iPhone, industry, browsers
toggle

Comments

  1. jhawk95

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2006

    -1

    Says who?

    Who said "although it may also be reflective of more spare time for existing owners"? The unnamed writer of this article?

    One would have to speculate that the same percentage of non-iPhone owners also had spare time throughout the holiday weekend and had the same opportunity to spend the same amount of time on their phone's browsers as well.

    Simply saying that perhaps more iPhones were not sold but that only iPhone users had the extra time to browse the web that week is not only very poor use of one's brain but also an opinion and has no place in what is suppose to be a news article.

    If this is an opinion of the writer, please state this is an editorial. If this is the opinion of an ANALyst or someone you interviewed for this story, please attribute said opinion to that person.

  1. 010111

    Junior Member

    Joined: Aug 2002

    0

    what?

    this is a blog. they are under no obligation to do any of the things you suggested.

    they neither have to give attribution nor specifically tag something as an 'editorial' to prevent your mind from being confused. there is no reason the author needs to be named.

    welcome to the internet.

  1. Guest

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 1999

    +4

    wrong @ what?

    Just because they don't have to and because "it's the internet" doesn't mean that they shouldn't. Your comment amounts to nothing more than "so what" which as any follower of Monty Python can tell you is just the automatic gain-saying of the previous statement and not an argument at all.

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -1

    um

    First, its a blog. Since when does anyone care what any blogger has to say?

    Second, the numbers have no meaning towards the iPhone, as I would argue that it could more likely mean a whole influx of iPod Touches were sold, not iPhones.

  1. Jonathan-Tanya

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2004

    +3

    yes and no

    first of all, lay off on all the debate...geez.

    second of all, the blog doesn't have to be scientific, but if its not scientific, then where is the nudity?

    a little disappointed here.

    iPhone/iPod, who cares... its all the same to app store and broswer usage. what if someone buys an iPhone but doesn't make a call that month? Is that a problem?

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    -2

    Re: yes and no

    iPhone/iPod does matter, only in the sense of money. iPods are recorded as a full sale, while those pesky phones are subscribed and stretched out. Ergo, if you want to know the kind of sales Apple may have had for either, it does matter.

    Then again, one would think anyone interested in such information wouldn't be reading some worthless blog....

    On the other hand, some no-name kid can put up a story about Jobs dying on a forum and it drives the stock down, so it turns out investors aren't as smart as they'd like people to believe.

    As for nudity, this is mac-fans here. The only nudity they care about is the take-apart photos of an iPhone. "Yes, that's it. Now take off the back cover....oh, yes, check it out....."

  1. Guest

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 1999

    +5

    iPhone Usage

    Hi I'm a product manager for AOL where I manager our mobile search products including a version for the iPhone. I can endorse what the writer of the blog is saying. On Christmas Day we saw the traffic to our iPhone site double. We did not see the same traffic surge on our Blackberry or Windows Mobile versions. This leads me to believe that there were an awful lot of iPhone under the tree/menorah/(kwanza?)

    For more details you can check out A Very Merry iPhone Christmas http://searchblog.aol.com/2008/12/29/a-very-merry-iphone-christmas/

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to overstate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming decline ...

toggle

Most Commented