I wonder if the ASA nailed MS over their Flying People ads for Windows XP?

The Brits can't be this gullible.

it's that our Advertising Standards are just REALLY high, possibly too high in this case. I've spent a decent amount of time in a number of other countries around the world and some of the advertising out there is just plain illegal and misinforming - I guess if they stop us having that type of advert then I'm happy. It's no biggy for Apple is it?

Surely you mean country?

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/239556/what-the-banned-iphone-advert-should-really-look-like.html

The Brit system bans anything they like. Except of course mass immigration/sponging from the system, and high taxation to pay for said spongers.
Thats just fine in the UK.

Anyway, this little problem is more due to the service providers (IE, O2 here in the UK) than it is for Apple. Its a shame O2 are not getting some heat for this, rather than Apple. As it's O2's data system which causes the c*** speeds in the first place. Apple hardware is more than up to the job..

Its no different to a TV advert for Apples iMac showing an internet page loading. My iMac doesn't load a page as fast as that! But I know it isn't Apples fault, it's my internet provider that is essentially responsible for that.

Actually I think this is quite fair. Anybody who says it's O2 fault hasn't used any other 3G network. The 3G speeds here in the US are just OK. Even in downtown Chicago where AT&T has blanketed the area with towers, 3G speeds are nowhere near what's depicted in the commercial. Loading an article on the CNN website can take anywhere from 4 to 10 seconds depending on which network I'm using, not the "instant" response depicted here. The Maps GPS feature can take 10 seconds to come up with a location, and then it has to "relocate" a second or two later because it put me in the wrong spot--whereas here, it's depicted as coming up instantly.
Usually in the US, commercials like this would say below "Pictures simulated" or something similar.

The iPhone ad purports to visibly demonstrate the virtue of speed that the device possesses. Bottom line, what they actually present is false and misleading by a significant margin, not a few seconds here and there but minutes! Also, the ads give a false impression of the speed and responsiveness of the iPhone interface itself that is nothing to do with connection speeds, 2G or 3G. Finally, is it not possible to criticise Apple where criticism is appropriate without someone saying "Yes but Microsoft is worse!"...? Please?

3G service in Vancouver, Canada is rock solid. My speed tests come in at over 2000kbps and I use 3G full time with WiFi turned off since i get better speeds with the 3G. I feel for those with crappy providers like AT&T because they are missing out on just how good 3G can and should be.

Anyway, this little problem is more due to the service providers (IE, O2 here in the UK) than it is for Apple. Its a shame O2 are not getting some heat for this, rather than Apple. As it's O2's data system which causes the c*** speeds in the first place. Apple hardware is more than up to the job..

But since Apple is doing the promoting, and is promoting not only the iPhone, but the service (thus the "Only available at..." lines at the end), the ad HAS to represent what BOTH can achieve.

Now, if Apple was hawking an untied iPhone and was just demonstrating what it could do, it would be perfectly fine.

Otherwise, you couldn't advertise certain things like software, where it runs great on some platforms, but someone could come in and say "Hey, on my Pentium II 400MHz machine, Adobe CS 4 sucks!" and have it pulled.