toggle

AAPL Stock: 111.78 ( -0.87 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

Apple sued for media player monopoly

updated 12:50 am EDT, Thu October 16, 2008

Apple sued for monopoly

Another lawsuit has been stacked onto Apple's list of current legal battles, with another filing in Arkansas from a Taiwanese media player manufacturer, Luxpro, that accuses the company of monopolizing the player market, according to documents posted on Justia. The suit alleges that Apple controls 80 percent of the music downloads through iTunes, selling songs that can only be played on its own product, while at the same time closing the iPod platform from playing music purchased from other online sources.

Luxor claims the actions illegally and intentionally leave consumers with "no choice but to purchase music from iTunes." The suit further states that Apple has "sought to monopolize the worldwide MP3 player market and crush legitimate, smaller competitors." The plaintiff references market share numbers from the US that show a 90 percent hold on the hard drive player market and 70 percent of the general market.

The filing goes into great detail about the success Luxpro achieved before a struggle with Apple. The problems allegedly started after the release of the "Super Shuffle" player in 2005, the same year that Apple released its iPod shuffle. Luxpro claims that Apple did not hold a trademark for the name at the time, but it nonetheless agreed to change the name of the device to the Luxpro Super Tangent.

Apple contacted the company in April of 2005 and demanded that the company stop marketing, producing, and selling all of its MP3 players. After a refusal to cease operations, Apple sued the company in Taiwanese court, successfully putting a stop to the sales, manufacturing, and advertising through a preliminary injunction.

Although the suit was eventually won by Luxpro, the current monopoly filing claims that it caused permanent damage to the company, and Apple's repeated attempts afterward to sue the Taiwan-based manufacturer made the situation worse. The iPod manufacturer even sent threatening letters to Luxpro's business partners demanding they drop Luxpro's products from their shelves, which successfully lead to dropped contracts.

The false statements, intimidation of retailers, and repeated lawsuits are provided as evidence that Apple engaged in illegal activities that caused harm to Luxpro's image and profits.

The company hired Patton Roberts, PLLC, a law firm that specializes in complex commercial litigation and class action suits, according to its website. The legal experts are not unfamiliar with battles against big companies, having successfully settled a suit against Microsoft from a cell phone manufacturer that accused the software giant of misappropriating its trade secrets. Another suit against an accounting company, accused of overcharging clients for air expenses, ended with a $108 million settlement.

Apple is under fire from several directions with accusations of monopoly. Another similar suit, filed in January, surrounds the iPod platform and DRM restrictions. Psystar, a company that was producing Mac clones that ran the Mac OS X operating system, was sued by Apple but responded with a monopoly countersuit.

Even the iPhone is not immune from litigation, with several court battles from users that claim false advertisement, poor performance, intentional SIM card incompatibility, and a platform closed to any software modification. Due to a five year exclusive distribution agreement with AT&T, customers will have to re-sign with the carrier even after their two year contracts finish if they want to still use their devices.




by MacNN Staff

POST TOOLS:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. ViktorCode

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +3

    Super Shuffle

    That says everything about Luxpro and about the actual reason for their lawsuit I need to know. And yes, you will lose this lawsuit as well, because Apple isn't "closing iPod platform from playing music purchased from other sources".

  1. horvatic

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +4

    They're all WRONG!

    iTunes works on Windows and Macs, you can burn CD's and play the music on a variety of platforms and players. Reimport from CD as MP3 and it can now be loaded on any MP3 player. They are WRONG!!

  1. webraider

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +4

    Maybe If

    It Might be a Monopoly if your ONLY choice was to buy music from the iTunes store however.. it's NOT your only choice. You can purchase Music from in the form of a CD.

  1. Guest

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +5

    success=monopoly?

    Since when has success been defined as a monopoly. All of these lawsuits against Apple shows how naive some people and companies can be. Maybe Apple should design another product, make it better than it's competitors, then subtract the best features so that they won't get sued for giving the consumers what we want.

  1. coldfusion1970

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +6

    Lock-in?

    I've purchased DRM-free music from the iTMS which can be played on any device.

  1. jonboy

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +5

    Look at Luxpro's player

    Is it really surprising Apple demanded they stop selling it. They were clearly making money by imitating the iPod shuffle so I really don't have a lot of sympathy for them.

  1. testudo

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +7

    obvious

    Just look where they filed the suit. Apparently they filed based on judicial location favorable to plaintiffs, rather than suing Apple in CA, where Apple is located, and it would have to stand on merits.

  1. phillymjs

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +5

    Yawn...

    "...while at the same time closing the iPod platform from playing music purchased from other online sources."

    The iPod can play MP3s, whether purchased online from one of several places, or ripped by the consumer from their own CDs. Case dismissed.

    You know the economy's bad when even the cheap-Asian-knockoff makers are feeling the pinch and trying to sue their way to some cash.

    Comment buried. Show
  1. Guest

    Joined: Dec 1969

    -18

    tired of apple's nonsense

    apple's game grows old real damn fast once you find yourself with hundreds of songs that cannot be played through anything but itunes and ipods. and itunes is the only viable digital distributor of music. apple blames the record companies, but apple is the one not licensing their drm.

  1. jpellino

    Joined: Dec 1969

    +6

    Monopoly is not illegal

    Abuse of it is. Scale does not equal abuse. Apple's model pre-dates their market share, so intent to crush smaller companies is false. And "no choice but to purchase music from iTunes." is simply and utterly false.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Dell AD211 Bluetooth speaker

For all of the high-priced, over-engineered Bluetooth speakers in the electronics market, there is still room for mass-market solution ...

VisionTek 128GB USB Pocket SSD

USB flash drives dealt the death blow to both the floppy and Zip drives. While still faster than either of the old removable media, sp ...

Kodak PixPro SL10 Smart Lens Camera

Smartphone imagery still widely varies. Large Megapixel counts don't make for a good image, and the optics in some devices are lackin ...

toggle

Most Commented