Giveaway: Bracketron Case If outdoor adventures are in your future this summer, enter to win a Bracketron Sport Case with Mount Strap from MacNN and keep that iPhone, iPod or other electronic device safe from the elements.      
toggle

AAPL Stock: 446.68 ( -8.06 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/08/06/18/xserve.virtual.servers/

Company sells virtualized Leopard server hosting

updated 04:25 pm EDT, Wed June 18, 2008

 

Xserve-Virtual servers


Following only a day after the release of Parallels Server for Mac, Media Temple has begun a private beta of (xv) (Xserve-Virtual), a new hosting service. The company takes Parallels Server, and combines it with Apple's Xserve hardware to run virtualized copies of Mac OS X Leopard Server. The primary advantage of this is said to be lower price overhead than a dedicated Leopard server, while still retaining access to flexible resources.

A limited number of participants are being accepted into the beta, and each copy of Leopard Server is guaranteed only 1/8th of a partition and 2GB of RAM. Similarly, the virtual nature of the service means that processing and bandwidth is shared with other customers. Final pricing for the hosting remains undetermined as Media Temple intends to test different configurations.


by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 enterprise, Xserve, networking, Mac OS X, Parallels, Leopard Server

Related Articles

Recent Articles

toggle

Comments

  1. UberFu

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2002

    +1
    06/19, 02:38pm | report spam | Reply |

    what is stupid here...

    ...is that since they already own a copy of Leopard Server and they own an Xserve - why in the h*** are they adding a middle man?

  1. MSchienle

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 1999

    +2
    06/21, 10:33am | report spam | Reply |

    Not stupid at all

    This has been going on for years using larger systems, but it is just now coming to MacOS X. By using an XServe as a virtual system each one is seen as completely independent from the others. This would allow the same username or program names to exist on separate partitions, but still use the same underlying hardware. It's like running 8 (or 200) different instances of Leopard Server on the same hardware.Whether it's cost-effective will be interesting. I run my own co-located Intel Mac Mini for about $75 per month and serve about 30 GB of data per month through a bunch of web-based applications from it. If they can beat that, I would consider giving up my own server and using a virtual one.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Brother HL-3170CDW LED Printer

We've mentioned before that we are far from a paperless society. For now, at least, there are tasks that require a piece of paper for ...

HTC One

It is hard to understate just how critically important the HTC One is to the Taiwanese company’s fortunes. Despite its alarming declin ...

Samsung Galaxy S 4

Samsung's new flagship Android smartphone, the Galaxy S 4, faces even stiffer competition than its popular predecessor. With a five-in ...

toggle

Most Commented

 

Popular News