04/29/2008, 12:10am, EDT
Tuesday, April 29th
Apple sued over iPod nano, touch connector
Interestingly, the iPhone is not cited in the complaint, although it was introduced before the iPod touch and uses a similar single unit design for the Flash memory drive connector, according to Information Week. In addition, the report notes that the lawsuit may have been meant, in part, to precipitate licensing discussions.
"They've been very slow in responding," Butzel Long representatives told the publication. "While the iPhone is not listed in the initial complaint, it's possible that the suit could be expanded to cover the iPhone," he continued.
According to the report, the lawsuit seeks damages for willful infringement and an injunction against the sale of the iPod nano and Touch, although the lawyers apparently backpedaled on the possibility of halting current sales, as the firm was not yet sure whether it would ultimately seek an injunction.
Filed under: iPod
Other story tags: patents, lawsuit, dock connector
,
, 18
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
All the same, this patent should have a very difficult time holding up. The caveat being that I am basing my opinion only on the description here, and not on a thorough reading of all claims made in the patent.
You are ALL in violation of this and I demand compensation_ 50˘ from ALL 6 billion+ people on the planet_
Also - it's prior art in favor of Apple - seeing as how the patent was filed in 2004 and granted 1.5 years later - between 3 and 5 years after the iPod hit the market_ WTF?