Macs better than PCs at Vista
updated 03:35 pm EDT, Thu April 17, 2008
Macs better at Vista
Popular Mechanics says that Macs run Windows Vista better than PCs designed to run the operating system. The magazine published an analysis based on user feedback and performance benchmarks for similarly equipped machines, using a number of 'real world' tests to evaluate the machines. Testers were asked to set up the computers right out of the box and "explore the machines through everyday tasks such as Web surfing, document creation, uploading photos, downloading Adobe Acrobat files and playing music and movies through Media Center and Front Row." The magazine said that in both the laptop and desktop showdowns, Apple's computers were the winners. Results found that both Apple computers ran Vista faster than the PCs did.
"Simply put, Vista proved to be a more sluggish operating system than Leopard. Our PCs installed some software faster, but in general they were slower in our time trials. Plus, both PCs showed weaker performance on third-party benchmarks than the Macs. Our biggest surprise, however, was that PCs were not the relative bargains we expected them to be. The Asus M51sr costs the same as a MacBook, while the Gateway One actually costs $300 more than an iMac," said the report.
[via The Inquirer]






Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Dec 2005
Macs are cheaper- duh
If you need the power Mac models offer, the components and line-item software value (not talking about quality at this point) end up being cheaper. The delta grows even more when you add in required anti-malware software and services.
This isn't news to most mac users, but it's good to see a widely-read non-biased publication putting some real numbers out there.