04/09/2008, 5:25pm, EDT
Wednesday, April 9thMicrosoft labels Yahoo/Google deal monopoly
Microsoft tonight quickly responded to Yahoo's Google ad trial, attacking the deal as a potential move towards a monopoly. The Windows developer argues that any more permanent agreement would place "over 90%" of all search ads under Google's control and would shut out attempts by other firms to offer alternatives. Microsoft says that its own proposed takeover would be more beneficial by establishing a second major search ad provider.
"This would make the market far less competitive, in sharp contrast to our own proposal to acquire Yahoo," Microsoft claims. "We will assess closely all of our options. Our proposal remains the only alternative put forward that offers Yahoo! shareholders full and fair value for their shares, gives every shareholder a vote on the future of the company, and enhances choice."
Yahoo has just recently rebuffed some of these arguments in a letter rejecting Microsoft's ultimatum. The former company's earlier statement accuses Microsoft of ignoring changes in share value that make Yahoo more worthwhile and dishonestly claiming that takeover offers were made as a friendly gesture.
Filed under: industry
Other story tags: Microsoft, Google, Yahoo
,
, 10
,
,
,
,
, 
subscribe to comments
for this article
No problem, AFTER Microsoft's monopoly is broken up. Obviously anything over 90% is bad. Then Microsoft is bad and something should be done about them first.
First all the contracts with the OEMs need to be further refined to eliminate any language that change financial "offerings" from Microsoft for advertising to the OEMs if they start installing any other OS on computers other than theirs.
ONCE that happens and Linux is as easy to get on ALL Dell, HP, etc., computers, then Microsoft can come back and talk about other companies and monopolies. At that point it wouldn't bother me one bit.
tell me he didn't really say that! no, really? he said that? with a straight face?
koolaid indeed.