03/20/2008, 11:20am, EDT
Thursday, March 20th
Apple patents 3D projection technology
In an unusual turn, Apple has patented a technology for simulated 3D projection, filings from the US Patent and Trademark Office show. Originally submitted in September of 2006, the patent revolves around a screen with an "angularly-responsive" reflective surface, working in tandem with a projector and a secondary device, described as a "3D imager." This component is key, as it is used to gauge the position of observers relative to the screen. As a person shifts their perspective, the system reacts, presenting separate images for left and right eyes.
Such a technique ultimately fools the brain in order to "mimic a hologram," according to the patent. Crucially, viewers need no special glasses or helmets. Images can parallax along multiple axes, and there is no need to remain in a single spot for the full effect.
What Apple would do with the technology is unclear; while Apple does produce branded displays, it has never sold a projector. Likewise, the proposed system would likely be elaborate and expensive, requiring three different elements that must be positioned neatly around a room.

Filed under: Apple
Other story tags: patents, 3D, projectors
,
, 15
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
Applying this technology to, say, an animated movie isn't quite there yet- not if you want decent quality. It sounds interesting though, being just short of a hologram. I could see this applied to game interfaces, if one could accelerate/scale movement made by the player to move further distances. Think of it as the ultimate Wii-like interface.
Don't expect anything of that sort to be on the market any time soon.
I wonder how Sony's cell architecture could help to make something like this happen...
Two things I don't get right off the bat: 1) What happens if there's more than one observer? 2) Unless this is coupled with some other new technology, it doesn't seem possible to get the image quality up to a level that Apple would attach its name to it. Is this a blanket patent covering some other upcoming tech yet to be refined?
If this will be an AppleTV add-on, it could have some huge possibilities!
If anyone else thinks this is projector dependent, please post why. I don't think it needs to be. The projector is merely representing the end display device which could be anything.
Secondly, what is the 'unusual turn' the first sentence talks about?