toggle

AAPL Stock: 496.08 ( + 2.91 )

Yet another iPhone patent lawsuit

updated 06:50 pm EST, Wed January 23, 2008

iPhone patent lawsuit


Apple has been slapped with yet another patent infringement lawsuit regarding the iPhone. This time the plaintiff is Minerva m owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 7,321,783 (the "783 Patent") entitled "Mobile Entertainment and Communication Device," which was issued on January 22, 2008. In other words, as soon as the patent was issued, the suit was filed. The suit alleges that defendants Apple and component supplier AtlanticRT have been and now are directly infringing, and indirectly infringing by making, using, offering to sell, or selling the iPhone which is covered by one or more claims

The patent describes a "mobile entertainment and communication device in a palm-held size housing (that) has a cellular or satellite telephone capable of wireless communication with the Internet and one or more replaceable memory card sockets for receiving a blank memory card for recording data directly rom the Internet and, in particular, musical performances that then can be selectively reproduced by the device for the enjoyment of the user, including both audio and visual recordings and reproductions.

The device also includes a camera and microphone for recording images and sound within the range of the device that can be wireless transmitted, either selectively or automatically to a remote telephone. Further, the device includes sensors for sensing unusual conditions that may also be transmitted to a remote telephone, together with the location of the device as determined by a GPS section of the device."

Minerva's suit alleges that Apple’s infringement has been willful since at least November 20, 2007. The company claims that after receiving notice of the '363 Application, Apple waited until approximately one week before the patent was to issue before sending prior art (the 'Apple Prior Art') that Apple contended rendered the claims of the ‘363 Application invalid.

Minerva says that the Patent Office determined that the claims of the ‘363 Application were patentable over the Apple Prior Art (and all of the other prior art that had been submitted), determining for a second time that the claims of the ‘363 Application were valid and patentable over the prior art, and again issued a notice of allowance.

Minerva seeks a permanent injunction enjoining Defendants Apple, Inc. and AtlanticRT Inc. to pay Minerva its damages, costs, expenses, and prejudgment and post-judgment interest and cease infringement immediately.

Apple has filed for a number of iPhone-related patents, including one for the multitouch keyboard, two for design and trademark, movable interfaces and more. The company has also faced a series of non-patent related iPhone suits, including one that claims the company deliberately misled consumers as to the practical costs of the iPhone.






by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. mgpalma

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2000

    0

    Good grief...

    I can't even think of anything else to say...

  1. t6hawk

    Mac Enthusiast

    Joined: Jan 2001

    0

    Prior art

    This is definitely covered by prior art and not just by Apple. I have a 4 year old Nokia cell phone that would most likely be infringing this 783 patent too.

  1. howiethemacguy

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2007

    0

    Useless patent

    If you're just going to patent some random ideas just for the sake of suing someone over an alleged infringement, that's f*cking lame! This is all about some loser nobody company who can't make money on their own.

  1. danofresh

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2008

    0

    Floppy?

    My god! Is item 200 a 5 1/4 floppy? I agree with howiethemacguy, get a grip.

  1. eddd

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Dec 2001

    0

    fishing

    Most likely fishing for a settlement. Patents don't guarantee anything - they're just another exhibit in court. This company (or more likely their lawyers) hope there's a dollar threshold beneath which Apple will settle for pragmatic reasons. We'll see.

  1. Loren

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2001

    0

    I dunno...

    That Figure 3 above, that sure looks like an iPhone to me!!

    That's it, I'm selling my Apple stock... no wait, wrong time...

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Re: prior art

    You can't base prior art on when a patent was issued, but when it was filed (and maybe even before then, if you have proof of development and data sharing).

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    BTW

    Should we just acronymize these things to be just YAPL?

  1. bjojade

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2007

    0

    Working product?

    Why isn't a working product required to get a patent? I mean, seriously. Everyone thought those things should be put together in a single device for a long time. Apple did it (sans the removable memory card) and has a product to show. Companies that have patents and no products should have no patents.

  1. horvatic

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2002

    0

    Agree with Bjojade

    It seems anyone can get a patent just by putting in prior information and sending it to the patent office. Get approved and start pending lawsuits all over the place. Never even intending to build a real product ever. Get rich on settlements and patent lawsuits and then retire. The Patent claims need to be changed! I agree with Bjojade that proof of the patenters product or products should be applied before a claim is approved. No product, no patent. It should be those that produce a real product first get the patent. And this patent seems to be so broad that all phone's are in violation not just the iPhone.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed