01/23/2008, 9:15pm, EST
Wednesday, January 23rd
Apple annual shareholders meeting: March 4
Shareholder proposal regarding advisory vote on compensation
The first of the two shareholder proposals revolves around compensation policies, regarding a low grade (D) from corporate governance advisory authority The Corporate Library, and to clear up any misinformation regarding backdated stock options.
Apple believes that the existing US corporate governance arrangements do not provide shareholders with adequate communication with boards on senior executive compensation. The company cites improved practices in the UK, where shareholders can cast an advisory vote on a director’s remuneration report.
The board of directors advises a vote against the measure, however, citing claims that it will only act as a deterrent from the Compensation Committee ensuring that executives are given the proper retainers and incentives.
Shareholder proposal to amend corporate bylaws, establishing a board committee on sustainability
The second proposal governs whether or not a committee should be formed to manage company “green” policies.
Apple says that it supports environmentally friendly practices, and has made recent strides in eliminating harmful materials and manufacturing processes. Regardless, the board advises against the measure, citing that another corporate layer will impede innovation and response to competing vendors.
Filed under: Investor, industry, Apple
Other story tags: environmental, stock, Cupertino, practices, annual, compensation, directors









subscribe to comments
for this article