toggle

AAPL Stock: 502.21 ( + 4.54 )

Leopard launch dwarfs Tiger by $70 million

updated 07:00 pm EST, Tue January 22, 2008

Leopard earns Apple $170m


Apple's Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard operating system, which launched on October 26th of last year, earned the company $170 million during its first quarter of availability. Those earnings compare to Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger's launch in late April of 2005, which earned the company roughly $100 million during its first quarter on the market. "We're extremely pleased with the very successful launch of Leopard on October 26th, and the response from both customers and reviewers have been terrific," said Apple CFO Peter Oppenheimer.

Apple is expecting much lower earnings during its next quarter as a result of an expected decline in Leopard sales. Historically many computer owners upgrade to a newly released operating system shortly after launch, after which sales tend to drop sharply.

Several factors contribute to operating system sales, however, such as late adopters who do not entirely trust the initial release of a new operating system. Those users tend to hold out until a more battle-hardened version of the OS is available, making their purchases much later than the early adopters who make up the initial wave of sales.

"We believe that 19 percent of the Mac OS X installed base is already using Leopard," Oppenheimer said.


by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. leamanc

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2003

    0

    Gotta be kidding

    "...the response from both customers and reviewers have been terrific," said Apple CFO Peter Oppenheimer.

    Pete has got to be kidding. I use Leopard every day, and like a lot of things about it, but there's no denying that this was the buggiest Mac OS release ever.

    Tech reviewers and customers posting on Internet message board have both been very vocal about Leopard's shortcomings. Granted, Apple still made a ton of money on it, but I can hardly qualify Leopard as a roaring success.

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Re: gotta be kidding

    A "roaring success" is different than "buggiest Mac OS release ever". It can be both.

    But also remember that most tech reviewers don't spend time using the software full-time for long periods. It usually is "OK, got this, let me install it, play with it for a few days, then move on to the next thing". So they review on the obvious, the superficial, the feature set, but rarely get to the points where the problems arise. And, if you're lucky, you'll get reviewers who don't use the previous version of the software, either, so they won't compare the two and list new shortcomings.

    But those are the reviewers the companies like, because they're more likely to rave their reviews and gloss over (or just not realize) some problems.

    That's why I prefer my reviews from a site like Ars-Technica, which would have a 12 page review of something like Leopard, detailing everything from the glitz to the underpinnings and stuff in between.

  1. Eriamjh

    Addicted to MacNN

    Joined: Oct 2001

    0

    Leopard kinda blows...

    I haven't bought it because NOTHING I use requires it. Tiger is rock steady. I'll get Leopard after a bunch of the bugs are fixed.

    Sure beats using Vista, though.

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Re: Leopard kinda blows..

    Yeah, and you're probably better off skipping every other version. That way you spend half as much time relearning a UI and changing your workflows because Apple decides they need to change stuff (well, Stacks had to be added, because everyone from 10.0 to 10.4.11 have been screaming for such an interface 'enhancment').

    I can see the advertising now: "You hated the dock in 10.0! You still hated it in 10.4! In 10.5, Apple performed what no one thought was possible, making the dock even less useful then ever! But you haven't seen anything yet! Coming with 10.6. The worst dock yet!"

  1. syzygi

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2008

    0

    Shortcomings?!

    So Stacks is disappointing if you actually used the dock. Most people serious about using there Macs for work use a launcher like QuickSilver anyway. I can't think of any real shortcoming in Leopard. Spotlight is better, stronger, faster... Time Machine works better than anyone thought. Mail.app is finally stable. Dashboard web clips work like a charm and the new core elements are just amazing to work with. So where are these supposed shortcomings?

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Powerbag Business Class Bag

Many companies currently offer battery packs and various accessories to keep smartphones and other gadgets charged when away from an o ...

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed