toggle

AAPL Stock: 506.38 ( + 4.17 )

Primate Labs: New Mac Pro is a better value

updated 06:20 pm EST, Thu January 10, 2008

Primate Labs tests Mac Pro


Primate Labs today released figures regarding performance of the new Mac Pro versus the old eight-core model. The old model is configured with the eight-core Xeon X5365, running at 3GHz, while the newer model features the Xeon W5462 running at 2.8GHz per core. Both machines were tested using Mac OS X 10.5.1, with the new Mac Pro using 2GB of RAM, versus the former that uses 1GB. Primate Labs says that the tests that GeekBench 2 uses to calculate RAM scores relies more on the speed of the memory rather than the quantity, so it was deemed a fair test.

Despite using a slower clock speed, the new Mac Pro trumps the old in all tests except for Floating Point performance, which is also reflected in the Overall score. Using a 1.6GHz G5 as a baseline score, rated at 1000, Primate Labs found that the new model was approximately 8-percent faster than the former with respect to Integer Performance, while the previous Mac Pro excelled at Floating Point calculations, coming in at just over 11-percent faster.

Memory and Stream Performance showed large improvements over the earlier incarnation, earning 24- and 34-percent increases respectively. Overall performance for the new Mac Pro was measured at 7598, versus 7680 for the former – a 1-percent difference between the two.

Primate Labs says that the results were surprising, considering the new machine uses a slightly slower clock speed, but agrees that the upgraded architecture has contributed to these numbers. The review also mentions that the new Mac Pro is a much better value, only performing 1-percent slower (overall) than the last version at a significantly lower cost.



by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    shocking!

    I can't believe apple released a newer machine that's faster than its previous model. What the h*** will they think of next????

  1. climacs

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2001

    0

    oh shut up

    jesus you are really tiresome.

  1. scottnichol

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 1999

    0

    re: shocking!

    you do realize that they're pointing out that the newer model at a LOWER clock rate is faster than the older one at a HIGHER clock rate?

    also, the price-point for the newer (entry-level) machine is much lower than the older (top-end) machine.

  1. jdien

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Dec 2001

    0

    something is wrong

    According to the original report (http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2008/01/mac-pro-performance-january-2008/) higher numbers are BETTER not worse. This is consistent with prior reports where the numbers are scaled in terms of how much better they are than a baseline Mac. That means that floating point was the one thing that was better than the old mac, the reverse of the conclusion.

  1. jdien

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Dec 2001

    0

    oops

    never mind. Got it reversed. Need sleep...

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Powerbag Business Class Bag

Many companies currently offer battery packs and various accessories to keep smartphones and other gadgets charged when away from an o ...

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed