AAPL Stock: 118.03 ( 0 )

Printed from

Radiohead: EMI main barrier to online music

updated 04:40 pm EST, Thu December 20, 2007

Radiohead on EMI iTunes

One of the key reasons Radiohead has refrained from signing on to digital music is licensing rights, the band's lead singer Thom Yorke says in an interview with Wired. The musician observes that the group's previous, multi-album contract with music label EMI contained virtually no clauses for digital music rights as it was struck years before digital music stores were available. Radiohead's release of In Rainbows in October with flexible pricing was the first real opportunity the group had to earn money on a digital offering.

"In terms of digital income, we've made more money out of this record than out of all the other Radiohead albums put together, forever -- in terms of anything on the Net. And that's nuts," Yorke says. "It's partly due to the fact that EMI wasn't giving us any money for digital sales. All the contracts signed in a certain era have none of that stuff."

The back catalog is also avaialble through the group's own website and also sells much of its back catalog through Amazon MP3, where the band's historical preference for selling its music only in a whole-album format has remained intact. In Rainbows will be available in a "traditional" physical CD format in the UK on December 31st and in North America in early January, the artist says, though online plans have not been announced.

A past report has suggested that Radiohead is becoming increasingly warm to offering music on iTunes but that either the artists or Apple will have to concede at least some of their past resistance to the other's approach to music to make a deal possible. Apple usually asks musicians to allow any average-length songs on multi-track albums to be sold individually as well as part of a larger title. Yorke does not hint at any talks with iTunes but warns any artists signing with a label to factor the store into their own contracts.

"First and foremost, you don't sign a huge record contract that strips you of all your digital rights, so that when you do sell something on iTunes you get absolutely zero," he tells new artists. "That would be the first priority. If you're an emerging artist, it must be frightening at the moment."

by MacNN Staff



  1. climacs

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Remember this

    the next time some record label *coughUniversalcough* whines about how Apple is s******* them over with the 99 cent/song pricing on iTunes. The real victim is the artist, and the only person who suffers is the coke dealer of the record label exec, who will be selling a couple fewer keys next year.

  1. climacs

    Joined: Dec 1969


    that is

    the victimizer is the record label not Apple...

  1. elroth

    Joined: Dec 1969



    All those so-called online "journalists" who want to be taken seriously should stop printing the words that come out of Universal CEO Jeff Zucker's mouth, and actually ask him some questions. They can start with "How much does ___________ get paid for the music that sells through iTunes?" and name some famous Universal acts. If he avoids the question, don't print anything he says.

    They pay screenwriters absolutely nothing for their movies that sell online, and they tell us Apple is the greedy one.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Ultimate Ears Megaboom Bluetooth Speaker

Ultimate Ears (now owned by Logitech) has found great success in the marketplace with its "Boom" series of Bluetooth speakers, a mod ...

Kinivo URBN Premium Bluetooth Headphones

We love music, and we're willing to bet that you do, too. If you're like us, you probably spend a good portion of your time wearing ...

Jamstik+ MIDI Controller

For a long time the MIDI world has been dominated by keyboard-inspired controllers. Times are changing however, and we are slowly star ...


Most Commented