AAPL Stock: 111.97 ( + 2.47 )

Printed from

Apple, Burst settle patent dispute for $10m

updated 03:05 am EST, Thu November 22, 2007

Apple settles with Burst

Apple and on Wednesday settled their patent dispute for $10 million dollars. The agreement ends almost 2 years of litigation and offers Burst a one-time payment of $10 million cash in exchange for a non-exclusive license to its patent portfolio -- not including one issued U.S. patent and 3 pending U.S. patent applications related to new DVR technology. A similar claim -- over a technologies used in Windows Media Player's transmission of music and video -- was settled in 2005 with Microsoft for $60 million.

As part of the settlement, Burst also agreed not to sue Apple for any future infringement of the DVR patent and any patents that might issue from the pending DVR-related applications. More than half of the recouped license fee is expected to pay for the court costs, expenses, and attorney's fees, according to the company.

The settlement ends a battle that began almost three years ago when Burst first claimed that the iPod infringed on some of its media patents. Apple soon filed a preemptive lawsuit to defend itself following a breakdown in protracted negotiations for issuance of a license of Burst's patents to cover Apple's iPod and iTunes products. Burst then countersued, alleging that its technology has been essential to Apple's success by and provided a critical part of the Cupertino-based company's audio and video-on-demand media delivery solution.

Earlier this year, a pre-trial hearing validated many of Burst's concerns over computer media transmission patents and Apple's attempt to dismiss the case failed: while nearly 14 claims were thrown out earlier this month, more than 22 were upheld by the trial court judge.

The $10 million patent license provides Apple with the right to use its intellectual property in its own technology and products, without further consideration. Burst, however, retains the right to enforce its patent portfolio against others and said it plans to continue identifying and evaluating companies who represent licensing opportunities and intends to diligently pursue those likely to yield suitable returns.

Burst, however, said it did not plant to announce specific names of suspected infringing products or companies in advance of negotiating with them or filing litigation to enforce its patent rights. Burst does not plan to publicly release any internal assessments of market segment size or dollar value of those markets, although it believes that they are significant enough to warrant the aggressive pursuit of patent licensing.

Legal fees, expenses exceed 50%

Court costs, expenses and attorney's fees in connection with the settlement of the litigation with Apple will reduce proceeds to the Company to approximately $4.6 million. According to the agreement, payment to Burst is to be made promptly after signing of a definitive settlement agreement. Burst's Board of Directors has indicated that it will be considering an undisclosed cash distribution to Burst's shareholders as remuneration for Apple's license fee.

by MacNN Staff




  1. tbo

    Joined: Dec 1969


    Looking at

    the balance sheet I cannot help but get the impression that its shareholders are trying to get money out of a dead duck. Burst is bankrupt.

  1. ViktorCode

    Joined: Dec 1969


    very generous

    h***, even $1 is generous when you toss it into troll's greedy palm. I really hope that other companies will continue to defend themselves in long court battles, then may finally burst without further income.

    And please, do some justice: Apple and others never used Burst technology, they used their own implemetations of "media streaming" and other basic ideas which Burst has conveniently patented.

    Idea is not a technology.

  1. howiethemacguy

    Joined: Dec 1969


    News flash...

    Burst quarterly profit at $10,000,000! Wow! Just like Creative's $100,000,000 profit after their $100,000,000 settlement with Apple.

  1. Mimi-mim

    Joined: Dec 1969



    The cheesy web-sited, opportunistic parasites at illustrate the systemic problems with the ridiculous US patent system. Oh, the irony that the leeches are leeched for half their winnings by lawyers.

  1. Feathers

    Joined: Dec 1969


    small price...

    $10,000,000 is a small price to pay to stop Burst going bankrupt and some or any potentially valuable IP getting acquired in a fire-damage sale by somebody with more financial clout to pursue (supposed) IP violations. Better Burst stay in business that let any of their patents (however valuable) fall into the hands of someone like Nathan Myhrvold.

  1. Loren

    Joined: Dec 1969


    beyond idea

    [Idea is not a technology.]

    You're probably not talking about Burst, then. They were awarded patents. Valid or not, weak or strong claims, you have to show reduction to practice reasonably understood by those working in the domain, or the PTO throws it out.

    [Oh, the irony that the leeches are leeched for half their winnings by lawyers.]

    Yeah, that's the tune we usually hear-- unless we're the little guys fighting the big guys.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Polk Hinge Wireless headphones

Polk, a company well-established in the audio market, recently released a new set of headphones aimed at the lifestyle market. The Hin ...

Blue Yeti Studio

Despite being very familiar with Blue Microphones' lower-end products -- we've long recommended the company's Snowball line of mics ...

ZTE Spro 2 Smart Projector

Home theaters are becoming more and more accessible these days, but maybe you've been a bit wary about buying a home projector. And h ...


Most Commented