AAPL Stock: 118.03 ( 0 )

Printed from

Apple to snap up 3.16GHz Xeons for this year?

updated 02:35 pm EDT, Fri October 5, 2007

Apple taking Penryn Xeons

Apple may be planning to consume the highest-end Penryn-based Xeon workstation CPUs when they launch in the fall, according to reported Japanese insiders. Although Intel has routinely demonstrated a 3.16GHz, quad-core Xeon model known as the X5482 since its spring Developer Forum in April, the company is said to be reserving this as well as some additional steppings of the 45-nanometer Xeon processors almost exclusively for Apple's Mac Pro systems. Dell, HP, and other top-tier workstation vendors will only get just enough processors at first to make their shipping claims honest, according to the sources.

The Mac designer is also allegedly considering a special 3.33GHz variant of the quad-core "Yorkfield" Core 2 Extreme processor, though its estimated high average power consumption of 130 watts would preclude the CPU from shipping in systems beyond the Mac Pro. Most other Apple systems use mobile Core 2 processors, which are not expected to share the advanced Penryn architecture until early 2008 or later. Intel has officially scheduled its first Xeon using the technology for November 12th.

Reports also allege that Apple's incentive to aggressively move to Penryn largely stems from Intel's inclusion of greatly increased memory bandwidth and SSE4, a new subset of instructions that should improve performance in optimized programs. Both would be especially useful for creative programs such as image and video editing tools, according to the insider.

Apple has largely left the Mac Pro's hardware untouched since its debut in August 2006, only adding a quad-core 3GHZ Xeon option in April of this year and making minor changes to storage options. The spring update effectively gave Apple exclusive access to the 3GHz processor until June, when Intel officially released the chip to all manufacturers.

by MacNN Staff




  1. Ikon

    Joined: Dec 1969



    I'm more concerned about photoshop going 64-bit. But it would hurt graphic people to have the fastest hardware at hand.

  1. BelugaShark

    Joined: Dec 1969



    This box is too expensive, Apple needs a mid-size Mac. So many people want a PCI Mac without having to dish-out over $2,000 for the Pro behemoth! This SUCKS

  1. Jonathan-Tanya

    Joined: Dec 1969


    imac underpowered video

    the imac has underpowered video...that kept me from buying one, plus I don't want to tie my monitor choice to my desktop pc.

    The fact that we later found out it has quality issues, didn't even matter. Apple release a mid range desktop! Geez...

    Apple thinks that if their customers aren't forced into uncomfortable choices and products that don't really meet their needs, that the world will end.

    It won't end, sales will just go up.

    Apple, you aren't about to go bankrupt...give your customers some choices, and see what happens...the marketshare will increase that much faster, and you can easily make money without bundling the monitor.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Ultimate Ears Megaboom Bluetooth Speaker

Ultimate Ears (now owned by Logitech) has found great success in the marketplace with its "Boom" series of Bluetooth speakers, a mod ...

Kinivo URBN Premium Bluetooth Headphones

We love music, and we're willing to bet that you do, too. If you're like us, you probably spend a good portion of your time wearing ...

Jamstik+ MIDI Controller

For a long time the MIDI world has been dominated by keyboard-inspired controllers. Times are changing however, and we are slowly star ...


Most Commented