RSS RSS Twitter Twitter
apple news/media reports

10/05/2007, 12:40pm, EDT

Friday, October 5th

Apple may open iPhone when Leopard ships

Apple may open up its iPhone to third-party developers who receive the blessing of Steve Jobs when the company ships Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard later this month, according to 9to5Mac. Rumors are circulating that the Cupertino-based company is speaking with partners who develop games as well as applications for the iPhone/iPod, and that it will use the development model created by T-Mobile for its Sidekick device to bring trusted developers on board. Those developers who create seemingly desirable software and who can refrain from interfering with software already available for the iPhone could develop their applications natively and potentially distribute their works with Apple's help.

Apple unveiled the iPhone early this year at the Macworld Expo in San Francisco and began shipping the device in late June. Since then, developers hoping to write software for the iPhone have either followed Apple's lead and remained within the confines of its Safari development environment or turned to a slew of "unlockers" who, through various means, managed to remove the device's restrictions against Apple's own recommendations and policies. Unlocked iPhones were crippled by Apple's latest iPhone software update, however, following a press release from the company stating that unlocking an iPhone could render the device useless and voids the warranty.

The new initiative, if true, would serve to open the iPhone up to serious developers and major companies like EA, which is currently said to be porting its entire iPod lineup to the iPod/iPhone platform for sale along with the classic iPod versions. Apple would still retain complete control over which developers could produce native software for the device, however, effectively splitting the difference between trying to maintain a completely closed system while eager hackers develop their own native iPhone apps and an entirely open system with no control over any developer savvy enough to compile programs for Leopard.


Filed under: Apple

, , 21comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz , Twitter



21 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All   Global Settings
best of both worlds
0
10/05, 1:02pm, EDT
Developers finally get a green light from Apple, but Apple maintains control over what is available to the public.

If these rumors were true, then Apple has been working towards this for a while, which means the perceived "silent hubris" is nothing more than Apple again being silent about their plans.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined May 2004
User is offline
squirrel_monkey
0
10/05, 1:12pm, EDT
No, no, you just don't get it. This will not placate or satisfy the "I want my native apps" crowd. They want unfettered access to the iPhone OR ELSE! If they can't install some piece of crap written by their "genius programmer" cousin they will continue to scream ,holler, whine, moan, berate Apple, sue Apple, start anti-Apple websites, shotgun web petitions all over hell's half acre. It's what they do. It's who they are.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined May 2001
User is offline
too good not to
0
10/05, 1:28pm, EDT
Of course they've been planning to add apps to the iPhone — it wouldn't make sense not to. They just wanted to do it THEIR way.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined May 1999
User is offline
Squirrel is right on
0
10/05, 1:31pm, EDT
It's getting REAL OLD, kids. If the most important thing in your life is hacking the f*cking iPhone, go for a long walk...
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jan 2003
User is offline
props to chotty
0
10/05, 1:42pm, EDT
absolutely right.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Sep 2001
User is offline
the right approach
0
10/05, 2:01pm, EDT
I've said all along that Apple should have veto power over what apps go on the iPhone and which don't. My sentiments have nothing to do with the suggestion that Apple should maintain a closed system and everything to do with iPhone stability. How many stories have we heard of third party apps on other smart phones causing the phones to crash?
Mac Enthusiast
Joined Sep 2001
User is offline
except that...
0
10/05, 2:19pm, EDT
Apple seems to have little problem with anyone gaining an SDK for OSX and writing Apps at random for the Mac - so if the iPhone is truely running OSX then why the big hassle with locking it out completely and pissing off 1 million people [arbitrary number folks] in the process ?

Why open it to only A"select developers" that have enough cash to grease Apple's palm [unless that's what they're going for?] and not simply add an iPhone SDK to the Dev site ?

So that anyone already out there building "hacked" Apps will likely migrate to the SDK and adhere so some form of standard ?

They caved when they released Boot Camp after the Intel based Macs came out - so that if people were going to run Windows then at least they'd do it somewhat safely_

The same thing is happening here - and eventually Apple will have to cave or end up losing customers and having to constantly spend time - resources and energy on blocking the hacks instead of developing for the platform_ They are simply prolonging a battle that Apple will never win_
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Oct 2002
User is offline
Stability is key
0
10/05, 2:34pm, EDT
I'd like to see Apple keep some control, to keep the phone stable and less prone to crashes/viruses/security breaches ... but at the same time, Apple would be foolish to NOT let developers help keep the phone "cutting edge" by bringing new apps and new functions.

Perhaps the iPod touch could serve as a kind of "incubator" where apps get tested and then the graduate to the iPhone once they prove ready for prime time.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Sep 2002
User is offline
my prediction from start
0
10/05, 3:10pm, EDT
i've always thought that apple would follow this model. and in fact, they'll probably end up selling apps through itunes, exactly how ipod games are already sold and distributed. it keeps the iphone secure and locked up while allowing limited access a veto power to applications not approved by carriers.

hopefully it plays out.

as for hackers and full access, i think this will appease enough people that the remaining population who complain about not having free and full access to the iphone will be obscured and probably move on to truly open linux phones...where they belong in the first place.
Dedicated MacNNer
Joined Sep 2000
User is offline
Leopard Delays
0
10/05, 3:52pm, EDT
Likely it was always meant to be developed for, but because Leopard had been delayed they couldn't because the framework wasn't there. I have a similar theory with the recent iMac freezeups, all this hardware was really meant to run Leopard.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2001
User is offline
additional comments:..1..2..3..Next
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

RSS Feeds

Have the latest content delivered to your desktop via RSS. Use the links below to get access to a specific blog, news, or reviews feed.



  MacNN -all

  MacNN Reviews

  MacNN Podcasts

  iPodNN

  Electronista

  Left Lane News
Want To Sell Your Laptop? Any Condition - receive Top Cash. Get an instant quote. Free shipping www.CashForLaptops.com

Internet Marketing School - 100% Online: Master SEO, SEM, E Commerce, Media & More with a U of San Francisco Certificate.

Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.