RSS RSS Twitter Twitter
apple news/media reports

10/02/2007, 3:50pm, EDT

Tuesday, October 2nd

Apple, Nike sued over Nike+iPod

A Highland, Utah-based shoemaking company, Leaper Footwear, has filed suit against Apple and Nike over the Nike+iPod Sport Kit, documents from Utah's District Court indicate. Leaper's founders, Greg and Kenny Anderson, say that the Sport Kit violates a 1998 patent, which involves the use of custom footwear to track performance, such as running/walking speed and distances traveled. Lawyers for Leaper are said to have approached Nike in 2000, suggesting to the company that it could license Leaper's concept. Though the offer was rejected, the Andersons charge that Apple and Nike exploited their idea anyway, announcing Nike+iPod in May of 2006.

If Leaper wins ts case outright, it will receive an injunction against the Sport Kit, plus legal fees and damages, the last as much as three times the standard amount due to Nike's "willful and deliberate" actions. More likely is a reduced judgment, or an out-of-court settlement. Leaper is requesting a full jury trial.

The Kit involves two main components: a special sensor that fits under the insoles of Nike+ shoes, and a wireless receiver, which plugs into any iPod nano. A Nano then tracks workout statistics, providing vocal feedback and the ability to upload statistics to the Nike+ website once the player is synched with a computer.

The lawsuit was first reported by Apple news site AppleInsider.


Filed under: Apple

, , 13comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz , Twitter



13 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All   Global Settings
Doesn't apply...
0
10/02, 4:17pm, EDT
Doesn't sound like it applies then, as the sensor could be stuck inside of any shoe and removed, whereas the patent was for "custom footwear", which implies a shoe designed for that specific purpose.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Mar 2007
User is offline
custom nikes
0
10/02, 4:34pm, EDT
actually, IIRC when the kit came out the shoe was custom, at least compared to other sneakers from nike...it had a little pocket built for the sensor.
Dedicated MacNNer
Joined Sep 2000
User is offline
Fault
0
10/02, 4:39pm, EDT
This definitely doesn't apply to Apple, as it doesn't affect what Apple makes or the part that Apple sells (the iPod).

It would affect Nike (who must make the sensor and the software to go along with it), but it appears they aren't worried about this at all. Either they have too much money or they are pretty sure they can get out of it.

Mac Enthusiast
Joined Apr 2001
User is offline
italics
0
10/02, 5:35pm, EDT
looks like someone forgot to close their tag...
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined May 2007
User is offline
interesting...
0
10/02, 6:08pm, EDT
did their patent include transmitting the info to an iPod? Therefore predicting the iPod years before its inception?

I wish I could get a patent on baseless lawsuits. then I could sue all these douchebags
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jul 2006
User is offline
I don't know...
0
10/02, 6:37pm, EDT
looks like this one might have some legs. ;)
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jan 2007
User is offline
Most people don't realize
0
10/02, 6:44pm, EDT
that there have been similar (and much more accurate) products on the market for years, including several by Nike. E.g., I started using the Nike Triax Elite in 2004. This product is a running watch which talks wirelessly to a foot pod with accelerometers in it. You lace the pod to the top of your shoe; it weighs a couple of ounces.

What's new about the Nike+iPod is the iPod integration and the smaller sensor size. (Of course, accuracy is sacrificed with the smaller sensor size... the Nike+iPod is better than nothing for reporting pace/distance, but not much.)

Seems like these guys really ought to be suing Dynastream, the company that makes the inertial footpod sensors everybody uses. (At least, they used to; I don't know about the Nike+ sensor.)

Saying that "Apple and Nike exploited their idea anyway, announcing Nike+iPod in May of 2006" is just ridiculous... unless, as dwoodruff mentions, the patent specifically mentioned then-nonexistent iPods. :-)

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Feb 2001
User is offline
closing tag
0
10/02, 8:33pm, EDT
[/i]

Did this work?
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined May 2000
User is offline
oh great!
0
10/03, 6:37am, EDT
oh great just what we need, another frivolous lawsuit! seriously, get a life Leaper. You're not the only one out there with good ideas.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jan 2007
User is offline
closed?
0
10/03, 6:41am, EDT
did that work?
Junior Member
Joined Aug 2002
User is offline
additional comments:..1..2..Next
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

RSS Feeds

Have the latest content delivered to your desktop via RSS. Use the links below to get access to a specific blog, news, or reviews feed.



  MacNN -all

  MacNN Reviews

  MacNN Podcasts

  iPodNN

  Electronista

  Left Lane News
Want To Sell Your Laptop? Any Condition - receive Top Cash. Get an instant quote. Free shipping www.CashForLaptops.com

Internet Marketing School - 100% Online: Master SEO, SEM, E Commerce, Media & More with a U of San Francisco Certificate.

Autodesk Inventor For Digital Prototypes: Use Inventor To Virtually Model, Test, and Iterate in 3D & Get To Market Faster!

Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.