toggle

AAPL Stock: 562.29 ( -3.03 )

Apple forces upgrade to updated iPod games [u]

updated 04:20 pm EDT, Tue September 18, 2007

Apple games for new iPods


Apple today released new versions of its Ms. Pac-Man, Sudoku, and Tetris games that work with the company's newest iPod models. Apple unveiled the new devices during a special event in San Francisco, offering consumers a revamped and renamed iPod classic -- formerly known as iPod with video -- and debuted a brand new player dubbed iPod touch which are both capable of playing games purchased from the iTunes Store. The newly released games work with both of Apple's latest game-compatible iPods as well as the older iPod with video, and are priced at $4.99 each as expected within the iPod Games section of the online store. However, users who purchased the old versions of these games will need to re-purchase them if they plan to play them on the iPod Classic and iPod nano -- the old versions are not playable on the new iPods.

Third-party developers are also working hard to expand the iPhone's entertainment capabilities. The first native iPhone game surfaced in mid-August, allowing iPhone owners to toggle light patterns ina grid while searching for just the right combination to shut lights off completely.

More titles continue to appear, including "Tap Tap Revolution" resembling the popular title "Guitar Hero." Tap Tap Revolution challenges players to touch the iPhone's sensitive screen in various patterns based on incoming sparkling lights as they descend from top to bottom, rating players on their reaction time and fingertip accuracy.

Update: Apple's update policy from older versions added.


by MacNN Staff

TAGS :

 gaming
toggle

Comments

  1. njfuzzy

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2001

    0

    Forces?

    I don't get it. Where are they forcing anything?

  1. digiprod

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2007

    0

    Yes Forces!

    The SIMS Pool and Bowling games were only brought out a few weeks ago, now incompatible with ANY iPod that Apple currently sells. Tetris is now being brought BACK out that most of us already bought. We are expected to re-purchase this again at full price.

    What next, will we have to re-purchase iWork or some other Apple software at full price, when they bring out a new Mac model?

    This is bad business, terrible to customers that will surely hurt Apple's image with people.

    Even Sony makes the Playstation backward compatible with the games they offer.

  1. miawj

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2005

    0

    ditto forces

    It will be fun to see how the fanbois try to spin this one.

  1. hayesk

    Professional Poster

    Joined: Sep 1999

    0

    Re: forces

    miawj, funny how anyone who disagrees with an attack on Apple is a "fanboy". When you resort to personal insults, it just dilutes any real points in the argument.

    Sony makes the Playstation backward compatible because it's cheap and easy. Do you really expect Apple to put an old iPod OS emulator in the new iPod?

    The new iPods have different operating systems. However, I think they should offer a cheaper upgrade. $1 would be appropriate.

    Maybe they felt $5 was cheap enough already, and the investment in infrustructure for upgrades (whether free or not) wasn't worth it. Not that I agree with it, but just offering an explanation.

  1. hezekiahb

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2006

    0

    ridiculous

    Depends on if the new version has significant improvements. This is Apple's choice, though it is an unintelligible one on their part as far as PR goes. Being right doesn't make you money & that is why comparing Dell customer service to AppleCare will often speed your AppleCare experience beyond their legally agreed support.

    For a forward thinking company I do find it most frustrating that you can't re-download purchased music & having to re-purchase games at full price is also ridiculous if you have purchased many. $5 can add up quick if you've bought like 15-20 games.

    Sorry Apple, normally a "fanboy", but dumb move.

  1. cblackmo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 2006

    0

    fanboi #1

    No spin necessary. Not having legacy support or auto-credit for a little arcade game is terrible and going to hurt Apple's image with people?? HAhaha. Sorry no disrespect intended - but that's kinda funny, when you think of the big picture. Life goes on you know.

    Arguing for a $200 refund after a price cut is one thing - whining about a $5 arcade game when you can obviously afford $150+ to have the latest iPod is just plain greedy. The catch with people getting accustomed to great service is they take it for granted and keep expecting more.

    I wonder how the games will work on the touch-iPod without a scroll wheel? Will a scroll whell be part of the game interface or some other type of joystick? Which would mean that the new games are actually two games in one. $4.99 would get you a game that works on two entirely different devices. How's that for spin?

  1. miawj

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2005

    0

    meanspiritedness

    It does not matter whether it's a $5000 copy of WebObjects or a $5 copy of Tetris. Adobe, Quark, Microsoft, Ambrosia et al all regularly offer new editions of their software at a reduced upgrade price. They regularly have to cope with changes to the operating system and changes of CPUs. Why shouldn't iPod games' providers?

    It is simply petty meanspiritedness by Apple.

    (Yes, I know. Mentioning 'reduced upgrade prices' in the same sentence as Adobe or Quark makes me snort with derision as well. Principle still applies, though.)

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Re: forces

    miawj, funny how anyone who disagrees with an attack on Apple is a "fanboy". When you resort to personal insults, it just dilutes any real points in the argument.

    Gee, what else would you expect a fanboy apologist to say!

    Sony makes the Playstation backward compatible because it's cheap and easy. Do you really expect Apple to put an old iPod OS emulator in the new iPod?

    Um, no, it was neither cheap nor easy to make the playstation backward compatible. It was a decision they made, but it wasn't a "Hey, let's just flip this switch for backward compatibility".

    It would be so much easier for Apple to make OS X 10.5 to be backward compatible with 10.4 and still support classic. But they chose not to, more because Steve just can't stand that OS. But I digress.

    The new iPods have different operating systems. However, I think they should offer a cheaper upgrade. $1 would be appropriate. Maybe they felt $5 was cheap enough already, and the investment in infrustructure for upgrades (whether free or not) wasn't worth it. Not that I agree with it, but just offering an explanation.

    But its lousy excuse. If Apple doesn't upgrade the games, that might be OK. But if they upgrade the games anyway, why not offer an upgrade price? Or is this just more of Apple trying to suck more money out of their customers.

    Can you imagine the backlash if Apple released an iPod that wouldn't play any of your existing iTMS purchased music, and you had to rebuy them?

    But the real problem is Apple decided to go to their new, and currently problematic, featrure-lacking, OS for the current iPod models.

  1. digiprod

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2007

    0

    Future sales of games?

    Maybe someone in Cupertino should have thought of how many sales of iPod games they will lose.

    In no place in the tech world are you normally expected to pay full price for the same exact product on the same platform!

    It is NOT a $5 game, many people have kids and may easily have 15-20 or more games. I doubt they will be so fast to re-buy them and certainly will remember how greedy Apple was when considering buying any new ones. Apple may have just killed off any chance for moving forward in gaming.

    I personally will never buy another game and will now reconsider any DRM crippled media from Apple. I just have lost trust in them.

  1. BDLatimer

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2005

    0

    No games for touch

    This article is VERY misleading: It states that Apple "debuted a brand new player dubbed iPod touch which are both capable of playing games purchased from the iTunes Store. " - which is quite incorrect. Not only do the existing games NOT work on the touch, Apple has publicly confirmed that games are not coming for the iPod touch “right now".

    Please, MacNN/iPodNN rep's: At least try to get SOME of the facts of your stories straight...

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented