apple news/media reports
09/10/2007, 10:40am, EDT
Monday, September 10th
Apple's Euro .Mac service slower than US?
Apple's European .Mac service, which offers customers online tools that integrate with the company's iLife and Mac OS X software, is apparently crippling transfer speeds for users downloading iWeb websites as well as images from Web galleries. Confused European .Mac subscribers are flocking to Apple's own online for answers to their slow transfers. Forum posters believe transfers from iDisks complete at full speed, but that downloads from European iWeb web sites as well as galleries are throttled down to 80KB/sec. One user notes that US .Mac users receive full speed transfers in all cases, leading him to question Apple's overseas policy and why Europeans paying for Apple's service must succumb to choked downloads from much of their online content.

Filed under: Apple
,
, 12
,
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
I recently travelled to the USA and the access speeds there are completely different!
So Apple needs to fix this ASAP, cause this stinks and could seriously hurt them if it actually came out that the darling of the 21st century sells a capped service to everyone but US customers!
Maybe its Jobs' way to protest all those countries helping the US fight the war in iRaq. .Mac stands for FREEDOM, baby! You terrorist-coddling countries!
Also, there may be some ISPs that could be capping the bandwidth to certain sites, and that's not something Apple would have any control over. (Note I said SOME, not ALL).
Still, if it was an oversight on Apple's part, it should be corrected, and users would be correct in bringing it to Apple's attention.
It's a true problem which needs to be addressed by Apple, like in Apple Inc.
Last I knew of, Apple didn't throttle .mac at all (err, couldn't, rather than didn't) -- it's possible that the service has been "capped", but if so, that would apply to both US and worldwide users, which seems like a losing proposition.
iDisk has always sucked when latency got beyond very, very reasonable limits (opening a NY "mirror" was considered, but not followed through on as 1/ it would be very expensive 2/ it wouldn't fix the problem.
Is this a new issue folks are seeing, or is it just old issue more noticeable?