09/06/2007, 8:45am, EDT
Thursday, September 6th
Analyst questions iPod line, lack of content
Market analysis firm iSuppli says that while Apple's revamped iPod lineup plays catch-up with other players in the industry, the company generally benefits from better execution of features of new features and that Apple's Starbuck partnership and the iPhone price cut would help Apple's maintain its leadership in the market. The firm, however, criticized Apple for the lack of video content announcements during Wednesday's iPod/iTunes event and questioned some of the company's product development decisions, including the continuation of the iPod classic line and the limited capacity on the full-screen iPod touch models.
Although some have speculated the iPhone price cut comes in response to disappointing sales of iPhone, iSuppli’s consumer research indicated that the iPhone outsold all competing smart-phone and feature-phone models in the United States in July on an individual basis. Despite the controversy, iSuppli said its teardown research indicates that Apple was generating a "robust hardware margins" at its previous $599 pricing, but that the iPhone would continue to be profitable for Apple at the new lower $399 price point.
Senior iSuppli analyst Chris Crotty was surprised that Apple didn't have any new video content announcements at special event -- especially given the recent controversial decision by NBC Universal to pull out of iTunes.
"One surprising aspect of the new nano is that Apple emphasized video at the start of its event today but did not follow through by announcing any content-related development for video," Crotty wrote. "Historically, Apple has coordinated hardware and content launches more effectively. An announcement involving video may have also diffused any of the potential fall-out resulting from Apple’s recent quarrel with NBC, which will no longer be distributing its content through iTunes."
While Jobs indicated his desire for NBC Universal to return to iTunes, some analyst believe the divorce hurts Apple more than the studio.
iSuppli questions Apple's product choices
The senior analyst for iSuppli's consumer electronics also questioned Apple's iPod classic and iPod touch line-ups, saying that the continuation of the iPod classic product line was a "stop-gap measure" until the company could add enough flash memory at an affordable price to provide high-capacity options.
"It raises the question of why a company would offer its best display, needed for videos—particularly movies—without employing the corresponding high storage capacities useful for video storage," Crotty opined. "Why was Apple against the idea of an iPod Touch with a hard drive? It seems like Apple had anticipated flash prices being lower and being able to offer higher capacities for the iPod Touch."
Crotty, however, was upbeat about Apple's new WiFi features and hi-res screen, although rivals such as Microsoft and SanDisk have already introduced them to the market. He complimented Apple on its execution of the new features, sayin gthat Apple’s Wi-Fi implementation is "more powerful" than those of its competitors.
In addition, iSuppli believes that the Apple's newly announced partnership with Starbucks ties into the Cupertino-based company's longtime iPod strategy of selling content at break-even prices to support sales of its high margin players and increasing switching costs among its customers. NBC Universal last week cited the same strategy -- in its public jousting -- saying it was at odds with the success of its content partners.
Filed under: Apple
,
, 17
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
Of course, they could've put a bigger battery in the "touch" but how fat would that have made it?
Video content from studios is *not* something Apple really needs for the iPod to succeed ... but it is the most important platform for content providers to break into in the long run. Otherwise people will resort to solutions (like EyeTV) for automatically recording and syncing to iPod, and the studios won't even get $1.99/episode. My 16GB 'Touch is ordered!
As for HD on iPod touch ... yeah ... I find 16GB a bit skimpy: basically 5GB each for tunes, photos, and a few films. But getting the form factor and battery life right is crucial. 160GB is no use if the thing becomes too clunky to carry, and the batt. life drops to 2.5 hrs video.
Again, classically ignoring obvious signs tossed right in front of you... yep, that's what analysts are good at.
Plus I do NOT think 16G flash or 160G HDD means significant cost difference, I would think them very close to the same. Still, I AM happy they are continuing with the Classic players... they really are no fuss, no muss music devices first and foremost. Face it, all the good demo toys on the Touch are simply overkill for a music player.
I wonder if the 160G Classic is the exact same size as the 5.5G 80G? And do we think of them as 6th Gen? Or 5.75???
Again, classically ignoring obvious signs tossed right in front of you... yep, that's what analysts are good at.
What's there to pounce on? Did you think that the reason the iPhone isn't worldwide was because of localization issues, and this is obviously pointing to the fact that its around the corner?
The iPhone is based on OS X, which is localized for loads of languages. Most people would just assume that localization would be in the iPhone as well, and so it gets glossed over out of the sheer "Well, duh" factor.