Apple files iPhone movable-interface patent
updated 02:55 pm EDT, Tue August 28, 2007
Apple iPhone patent
Apple has filed a patent covering user interfaces on portable devices with touchscreen interfaces (presumably the iPhone and or iPod) that would allow for quick reconfiguration of on-screen elements, including icons. For instance" the user makes contact with one of the icons and moves the point of contact across the display surface; the motion and contact are detected by the portable "electronic device" and the displayed icon is moved accordingly. This would appear to represent an easy method for re-arranging the applications that appear on the iPhone's home screen, or SpringBoard. The patent also allows for icons to be automatically displaced by other icons, and the movement of icons to static-placed holders akin to the Dock in Mac OS X.
This is already present
08/28, 03:14pm reply
This is already part of the iPhone interface. In the iPod section, the icons for things like playlists/albums/podcasts can be rearranged.
njfuzzy
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Apr 2001
Wow!
08/28, 03:47pm reply
Its like rearranging icons on your desktop Mac, but using your finger and performing it on a mobile telecommunications device!
Thank god Apple's patenting this!
testudo
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Aug 2001
one word....
08/28, 05:03pm reply
lcars...
a nickle for anyone who knows what lcars are...
Chris
cgmpowers
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Mar 2003
Sad
08/28, 05:53pm reply
That someone can patent dragging and dropping icons. Is there no applicable prior art or obviousness test at all?
Hey, I just used my finger on the trackpad to move an application icon onto the dock on my MBP, and the other icons rearranged themselves accordingly. Isn't my WiFi-enabled notebook a "portable communications device"?
nhmlco
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Mar 2007
Well Yes, but....
08/28, 07:11pm reply
The thing is, lets say Apple doesn't patent it. I mean I know Apple has never been sued or anything by someone trying to cash in on it's success, but someone comes out of the woodwork and say hey, I patented this in 1984 as you can see from this extremely vague description, which I meant to mean this very thing Apple is now using. On second thought, that's just fantasy. I suppose the difference is Apple is using these patents in it's products.
slider
Mac Elite
Joined: Oct 1999
to cgmpowers
08/28, 08:53pm reply
Try this link for a possible explanation of "LCARS". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LCARS
Nice patent for Apple to apply for!
EnviroG
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Aug 2007
Re: well yes, but
08/28, 10:53pm reply
The thing is, lets say Apple doesn't patent it. I mean I know Apple has never been sued or anything by someone trying to cash in on it's success, but someone comes out of the woodwork and say hey, I patented this in 1984 as you can see from this extremely vague description, which I meant to mean this very thing Apple is now using. On second thought, that's just fantasy. I suppose the difference is Apple is using these patents in it's products.
Apple patenting it does NOT prevent someone from claiming they patented it in 1984. (Of course, the patent from 1984 has expired, so that won't help anyway). If someone has a patent prior to Apple's application (and other paperwork/proof of development), they still can be sued.
testudo
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Aug 2001
one thing interesting...
08/29, 11:24am reply
Sounds to me like a future update to the phone will allow us to change the 4 main apps at the bottom as well as rearranging the "subapps" at the top.
Also a chance there will finally be games?
ccrider
Mac Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2001