08/21/2007, 11:00am, EDT
Tuesday, August 21stWal-Mart sells MP3s from EMI, Universal
Wal-Mart today opened its MP3 music downloads, giving customers the option of unprotected songs playable on any device rather than the protected Windows Media files that have been the staple of the retailer's website. The initial catalog includes both music from EMI as well as the recently promised Universal music library, which gives customers the option of artists such as 50 Cent and Bon Jovi. Tracks typically sell at nearly the same price as protected versions with individual songs offered for 94 cents each and most albums available for about $9.22.
The catalog and pricing significantly undercut Apple's offering, which is currently limited to only EMI musicians and is obligated to charge $1.29 per song, roughly a third more than its new competitor. Wal-Mart has not explained whether the pricing applies to all tracks but promises that its MP3s are completely compatible with devices that have typically been excluded from its online store, including iPhones, iPods, and Microsoft's Zune.
Accessing the store officially requires Windows XP or Vista, and Wal-Mart has not said whether it will change the conditions for access now that Macs, Linux, and earlier versions of Windows can now play its content.
The deal with Universal is currently a trial run that may expire as soon as January depending on its results, which the company claims will be used to determine the viability of selling music without DRM. Multiple reports have suspected that deals with Wal-Mart, as well as other smaller stores such as Rhapsody, are ultimately meant to test non-iTunes sales and pressure Apple into delivering more favorable contracts for hosting Universal artists.
,
, 10
,
,
,
,
, 
subscribe to comments
for this article
There are some that are still $12.99 but many are $9.99 and even $7.99 (Amos Lee for example). The songs by themselves are still $1.29 though.
Lower quality of the Mp3 files of course translates to lower price for mp3 files. ENough said.
"We're sorry, your operating system is incompatible. To provide the best download experience, we can no longer support Windows 98, ME or NT. Please visit again after you upgrade to Windows 2000 or XP. Visit our Help section for complete system requirements information."
interesting.
That's nice, but, then again, they also state they were going for interoperability with most/all devices. You still can't say that about mP4.
and we think the quality of "new" music stinks now....
If only one company sells an mp4 player, then the demand for mp4 format compatibility isn't there?
If every other mp3 player manufacturer doesn't build in mp4 compatibility, then there is no demand for the mp4 format?
What the heck is the hold up on mp4 in the player arena? Why make new players without a the superior and currently open standard anyway?