08/21/2007, 6:35pm, EDT
Tuesday, August 21st
Apple, MS, Dell caught editing Wikipedia
It appears that representatives or at least employees of Apple, Microsoft, Dell and other major brands have been editing Wikipedia entries concerning their companies, in some cases removing or altering truthful but pejorative information and in other cases adding negative entries about competing firms. The findings come from Virgil Griffith, who created a program -- dubbed Wikipedia Scanner -- that reveals who edits Wikipedia articles, via a system where it scans the IP address and cross-references it with a geographical database. Among the allegations: Microsoft tried to cover up the Xbox 360 failure rate; Apple edited Microsoft entries, adding more negative comments about its rival, and vice versa; Dell deleted negative comments on customer services and removed a passage how the company outsources work to third world countries.
MaltaStar reports that Griffith created the tool to "create minor public relations disasters for companies and organizations I dislike." [...] "He admitted that it's impossible to be sure if the edits were made by someone working at one of the organizations, although the IP address reveals that they were made by someone with access to their network, he says."
Filed under: Apple
,
, 10
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
second - this is pretty funy.
third - you mean there might be phony Wikipedia articles????? NOOOOO.
and vice versa.
all this is a publicity stunt for wiki anyway
the real problem here is the fine line between common knowledge and slander or factual accurate details and negative mumbo
Sooo, which companies doesn't he like? Apparently, ALL OF THEM!
This guy is going to have quiet a time keeping his Wiki page from being bogusly edited. Employees from every company in America now are going to be after him.
THEN invent the scanner program.
I can't believe Microsoft would stoop sooo low. I've lost so much respect for them now. Billy, say it ain't so! lol.
Primary entries should be locked and uneditable. Commentary should follow.
(Locked? Uneditable? ... REMIND you of anyone?)