Please help us by taking our survey
other applications

08/16/2007, 5:45pm, EDT

Thursday, August 16th

Benchmarks: VMware Fusion trounces Parallels

In a new set of benchmarks comparing SWsoft's Parallels Desktop 3.0 for Mac, Apple's Boot Camp 1.3 Beta, CrossOver Mac 6.0 from CodeWeavers and VMware's Fusion, Boot Camp (as a native Windows environment) unsurprisingly shows the best performance overall, but VMWare's Fusion shows a dramatic advantage over other virtualization solutions, including Parallels. The tests, performed on an eight-core, 2.66GHz Mac Pro running Mac OS X 10.4.10, show VMware completing a set of multimedia multitasking routines in about a quarter of the time of Parallels; 874 seconds vs. 3,260 seconds. Photoshop CS3 performance was almost twice as fast under Fusion relative to Parallels Desktop, completing a series of tasks in 271 seconds vs. 516 seconds.



One of Fusion's primary advantages in the test is that it takes advantage of two CPU cores, while Parallels only takes advantage of one.

We recently published an in-depth look at Fusion along with commentary from Pat Lee, product manager of at VMware. Lee said that VMware generates "less overhead, and puts less strain on your Mac than other solutions." Lee also said that only VMware supports more than 1.5GB of RAM in a virtual machine (in fact, it supports up to 8GB).

Designed to rival Parallels' "Cohesion" functionality, VMware's Unity let's users run Windows applications like Mac applications. They can be minimized to the Dock, and adhere to other Mac-compliant application standards. You can also drag and drop files from the Finder to a Windows app running under Unity. For instance, if you are running Outlook in Windows, you can drag an attachment to into a newly created email message.


Filed under: software
Other story tags: Other Applications

, , 28comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz


28 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All   Global Settings
i concur
0
08/16, 5:56pm, EDT
I've been a Parallels user from the beginning, but I've now completely switched to VMWare Fusion for reasons of stability and performance...

Parallels now needs to concentrate on quality and polish and stop trying to get as many buggy features in as possible.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jun 2005
User is offline
Yes, but...
0
08/16, 6:06pm, EDT
Yes, Parallels was a little slow, but it was innovative and they moved fast into the market. I would have stayed with them if they had only bothered to provide even a modicum of service. As it was, they wouldn't even bother to return e-mails or phone calls when you were trying to give them money for upgrades, let alone when you actually needed tech support.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jun 2007
User is offline
Service
0
08/16, 6:36pm, EDT
Parallels probably has the worst support in the industry. And it's a program that when things go wrong you can lose a lot. No response to emails or phone calls. I finally called the sales line and was told that the main office is in Moscow which causes serious delays. No excuse though as they probably made 10's of millions and won't open a real support center in the US where I assume the majority of sales come from...-
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jun 2007
User is offline
Not entirely fair test
0
08/16, 6:40pm, EDT
I think VMWare is likely to be faster, based on my experience with the software, but for this to be a proper benchmark, it should have been more controlled. I would have preferred to see how it worked with 1 core so we could see the actual optimization of the software.

Most Macs are dual-core, not eight-core, so it's also not terribly useful for the zillion people on MacBooks either.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Dec 2005
User is offline
Fusion networking slower?
0
08/16, 6:51pm, EDT
I tested both Parallels (1.4GB of RAM because it wouldn't work with 1.5GB) and Fusion (2GB of RAM and one CPU core) on my Mac Pro (3GHz 4-core, 14GB RAM). I primarily used them with a usenet news reader called Newsbin Pro. I found that Parallels would max out my downstream bandwidth while Fusion would not. Also, when mounted my Bootcamp partition (the same partition that Parallels and Fusion used) in OS X and tried to play videos, it would stutter with Fusion and never did with Parallels.

Fusion crashed on me a few times after leaving it up and running for about 3 days. Parallels also has some bugs to work out... It has problems handling memory and can not boot when I assign 1.5GB to my VM. It works when I assign 1.4GB to it, but if I quit and try to re-launch Parallels, it won't boot because of the same memory issue.

In my opinion, both are still still need a few more bug fixes...
Mac Enthusiast
Joined Nov 2005
User is offline
junk v professionals
0
08/16, 7:08pm, EDT
Parallels and its support have evolved into lousy. VMWare has professional support that have specifically researched some matters I brought to their attention. I finally gave up trying to get any response from Parallels regarding my confusing license situation and the reasons it trashed my bootcamp operating system.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Feb 2007
User is offline
Parallels Support
0
08/16, 8:52pm, EDT
I agree. Parallels is by and large an ok product. But God forbid you require any assistance. E-mail responses (if any) are brief and never helpful.

NOTE TO VM/FUSION: Create a Parallels Migration Tool and you'll make money hand over fist.

Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jun 2007
User is offline
A switcher
0
08/16, 9:11pm, EDT
I also started using Parallels from the beginning and switched to VMware. I always thought VMware felt faster than Parallels and it definitely didn't slow down my entire system the way parallels does. Parallels also feels too much like a hack.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined May 1999
User is offline
real pc
-1
08/16, 9:43pm, EDT
Why don't you just spend the $1.95 to buy a real pc, and get stick of gum along with it. I guess its not really that simple anymore, not if fusion is giving you cut and paste with your mac apps (plus if you have a laptop)...but for now I'm happy having a real pc to go with the mac....fast, and really not all that expensive.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Oct 2004
User is offline
VMWare all the way
0
08/16, 10:07pm, EDT
I started with Parallels, but it became slower and slower. Now, if I load up Parallels, it locks my machine for about 5 minutes and then works at glacial speeds when it finally starts responding.

VMWare is a thing of beauty. It works exactly as advertised. Once the extend their snapshot functionality to allow multiple snapshots, they'll have everything.
Senior User
Joined Apr 2001
User is offline
additional comments:..1..2..3..Next
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

RSS Feeds

Have the latest content delivered to your desktop via RSS. Use the links below to get access to a specific blog, news, or reviews feed.



  MacNN -all

  MacNN Reviews

  MacNN Podcasts

  iPodNN

  Electronista

  Left Lane News
Turn your laptop into CASH: Sell us your used laptop. Working or not. Get money FAST. Instant online quote. Shipping is FREE.

PowerBookMedic will fix any Apple laptop or iPod: We offer Parts, Hard Drives, Superdrives, Ram Upgrades & Repairs all backed up w/ our 1YR Warranty!

Check Out the VIERA from Panasonic!: Enter a New Visual Era with Panasonic VIERA HDTVs. An Enhanced Experience.

PowerBookMedic will fix any Apple laptop or iPod: We offer Parts, Hard Drives, Superdrives, Ram Upgrades & Repairs all backed up w/ our 1YR Warranty!

Check Out the VIERA from Panasonic!: Enter a New Visual Era with Panasonic VIERA HDTVs. An Enhanced Experience.

Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.