08/13/2007, 1:40pm, EDT
Monday, August 13th
Mac mini (August 2007) benchmarks
The site compared Mid 2007 Mac minis running at 1.83 and 2GHz with Core 2 Duo processors and 2GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM against Early 2006 Mac minis with Intel Core Duo processors running at 1.66 and 1.83GHz also with 2GB of RAM. Also compared were PowerPC Mac minis running at 1.25, 1.42 and 1.5GHz, equipped with 1GB of RAM each. The Core 2 Duo-based Mac minis showed only marginal performance increases over the Core Duo-based models. The author of the benchmarks article said "Moving from the Core Duo to the Core 2 Duo brings modest performance improvements without an increase in clock speed, and moving from 1.83GHz to 2.0GHz brings (unsurprisingly) another modest increase in performance. If you're running a previous generation Mac mini I see no real reason to upgrade (unless, of course, you want to use 64-bit applications."


The new Mac minis ship with an Apple Remote with Front Row, support up to 2GB of memory, use the Intel GMA 950 graphics processor and offer 802.11 b/g wireless networking. They also ship with the newly released iLife '08 suite rather than iLife '06, which was included with the previous models. The new Mac minis are still priced from $599, and available from the online Apple Store.
Filed under: Apple
,
, 8
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
Aside from the, the Mac mini was really just an evolutionary, simple upgrade to keep it on the books. Nothing exciting, and no one should have expected anything earth shaking.
I'd buy a mini tomorrow if I was guaranteed a free copy of OS X.5 when it's released.
Until then, I wait.
This calls for a mid-range Mac. MacPro is too much and the Mini is too little.
But a mid-range mac? Hmmm. That sounds intriguing. Maybe if its in the mid-range, there could be some open ports and a swappable video card. Wow, I wonder if anyone else has thought of this! I should contact Apple immediately, it could be ready by XMas!