toggle

AAPL Stock: 423 ( -8.77 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/07/08/09/imac.benchmarks/

Performance benchmarks for new iMacs

updated 07:55 pm EDT, Thu August 9, 2007

 

iMac benchmarks


PrimateLabs has posted a series of benchmarks for the new Core 2 Duo-based Mid-2007 iMacs. The site tested a an iMac (24-inch Mid 2007) with an Intel Core 2 Duo at 2.4GHz, 2GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM and Mac OS X 10.4.10 (Build 8R4031) against previous generation iMacs (24-inch) with Intel Core 2 Duo processors at 2.33GHz and 2.16GHz. Overall, the new 2.4GHz iMac posted a score of 3243, compared with 3049 for the older 2.33GHz model and 2898 for the older 2.16GHz model. Unfortunately, the article neglects to do any graphics benchmarking with the new ATI cards that are included in the Mid-2007 iMacs.



The comparison concludes "The latest 24-inch iMacs have two major advantages over the older 24-inch iMacs; they have faster processors, and they use the new Santa Rosa chipset (instead of the Napa chipset used in the older 24-inch iMacs). The faster processor helps increase both integer and floating point performance, while the faster front-side bus on the Santa Rosa chipset helps increase both memory and stream performance."




by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 Apple
toggle

Comments

  1. ruperts

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    the new chipset

    doesn't seem to make that much of a difference ??

  1. testudo

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Whaaaa????

    You mean the inclusion of a faster chip makes the computer relatively faster? Man, I never would've guessed!

  1. UberFu

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 2002

    0

    big comparison...

    a 2.16Ghz chip is slower than a 2.33Ghz chip is slower than a 2.4Ghz chip - who would have guessed ??

  1. elroth

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2006

    0

    interesting

    The point is how much faster it is (by this test, anyway). The chip speed (from the 2.33 to the 2.4) is increased by 3%, but results in a performance increase of 6.36%. That's worth noting.

    However, comparing the 2.16 chip to the 2.4, the chip speed is 11% faster, and the performance is 11.9% faster - you'd think it would be better than that, with the new chipset.

  1. nativeNYer

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2005

    0

    more complete benchmarks

    I suggest heading over to Macworld.com where they just today posted a much more complete benchmark tests on these new iMacs, and even compared them to the top end iMac G5, before it went Intel, as a comparison. They also test the video card, which these benchmarks leave out.

  1. Monde

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2004

    0

    Waddabout the 2.8GHz iMac

    I'd like to see numbers on the 2.8GHz model with the unlocked multiplier. Oddly the numbers look okay, but-outside of the redesign-this upgrade looke like a speed bump, performance wise.

    Am I missing something? If I were looking to buy and iMac, I'd have to wonder if the mini weren't the better performance for dollar bargin.

    Just how fast would be this "extreme" iMac?

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Logitech FabricSkin Keyboard Folio for iPad

Since the fourth-generation iPad didn't evolve much over its predecessor, the market for iPad accessories has remained somewhat static ...

Huawei Ascend Mate

The Huawei Ascend Mate is a phone that fits the screen-size gap between the 4 to 5-inch smartphone and the seven-inch or more tablet, ...

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

toggle

Most Commented