Apple: $818m in profit, record 1.76m Macs
updated 04:35 pm EDT, Wed July 25, 2007
Apples $818m in profit
Apple posted revenue of $5.41 billion and net quarterly profit of $818 million, or $.92 per diluted share, compared with revenue of $4.37 billion and net quarterly profit of $472 million ($.54 per diluted share) in the year-ago quarter. The numbers were well ahead of street consensus estimates of $5.28 billion and $0.72. The company's gross margin was nearly 37 percent, up from 30.3 percent in the year-ago quarter, while international sales accounted for 40 percent of the quarter's revenue. Apple said it shipped 1,764,000 Macs, representing 33 percent growth over the year-ago quarter and exceeding the previous company record for quarterly Mac shipments by over 150,000. Apple also sold 9,815,000 iPods during the quarter, representing 21 percent growth over the year-ago quarter.
"We're thrilled to report the highest June quarter revenue and profit in Apple's history, along with the highest quarterly Mac sales ever," said Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. "iPhone is off to a great start -- we hope to sell our one- millionth iPhone by the end of its first full quarter of sales -- and our new product pipeline is very strong."
"We are very pleased to report strong financial results including cash flow from operations exceeding $1.2 billion for the quarter," said Peter Oppenheimer, Apple's CFO. "Looking ahead to the fourth fiscal quarter of 2007, we expect revenue of about $5.7 billion and earnings per diluted share of about $.65."











my stock!!!
07/25, 04:43pm reply
heh! So Apple's growth is strong. No worries, mate! Have another cup of coffee. ;)
Flying Meat
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jan 2007
No iPhone numbers.
07/25, 04:53pm reply
Interesting that they didn't release any hard iPhone numbers. If they hoping for a million in the first quarter, then the 500,000-700,000 first-week numbers are probably way off.
nhmlco
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Mar 2007
iPhone Numbers
07/25, 04:58pm reply
Rueters is reporting that Apple revealed that it sold 270, 000 iPhones in the first quarter, which would be the first two days.
http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUKWEN969920070725?rpc=44
Terrin
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jan 2006
1,764,000 Macs
07/25, 05:14pm reply
Right, can you please pull back some engineers from this phone project and come up with an updated mac mini or Imac ?
tortenteufel
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jul 2007
GM
07/25, 05:30pm reply
Funny, of all the figures, the one that jumps out at me is the gross margin. 37 freaking percent? For a CE focused, hard goods company?
I can't tell you how unbelievable that is. What it actually means is that their products are way overpriced... but also says their marketing is so brilliant, that they get folks to keep paying the price.
Think about this... they could sell the mid range tower for 1800 bucks, a 20" iMac for 900, a 30G Pod for 150, and STILL makes large profits.
paulc
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Overpriced?
07/25, 05:54pm reply
R&D isn't free. You're saying that because Apple isn't charging the minimum amount it costs to assemble and iPhone, it's overpriced.
First of all, Apple is not a charity. Do you expect them to give their products away at cost? Second, Apple does their own R&D, and that costs money. A lot of money. How many man-hours do you think it took to create the iPhone? I believe Jobs said that they had been working on it for three years. Those people don't work for free either.
I'm guessing if they sold their products at the prices you mentioned, it wouldn't quite be enough to cover all their expenses. Yes, it's a lot of profit, but it also costs a lot of money do things the way they do it.
Johnny Niles
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jun 2007
Agree with Johnny
07/25, 06:02pm reply
I have to agree with Johnny. R&D, Marketing, manufacturing all cost lots of money. So sure the product by itself maybe cheap to pay for in parts, but the bottom line is that doesn't tell the whole story.
horvatic
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Apr 2002
I don't get it...
07/25, 06:10pm reply
Neither Apple nor at&t made any predictions as to how many iPhones would be sold. Neither said a single word. So some analysts pulled a figure out of their asses and it became the gospel number for the Jesus device? Now the real sales figures don't match the figure pulled from analyst's anal cavities and suddenly the iPhone is a dud and the stock drops 6% in a day.
Could someone PLEASE explain this to me! Now I know why I pretty much stay away from stocks in where I keep my meager assets.
lkrupp
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: May 2001
Some folks
07/25, 06:10pm reply
seem to be eternally stuck in the "what about me?!!" camp.
Apple has great products and they sell at competitive prices with comparable quality goods. By some numbers, its cheaper to buy and own that those comparable quality goods. But that's never good enough, is it?
Flying Meat
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jan 2007
R&D
07/25, 08:02pm reply
the cost of R&D can't be overstated with a company like Apple. They design and rethink just about everything. Companies like Dell and HP let their suppliers do a great deal of the work, but Apple does their own engineering and designs. This used to be a reason they were scoffed at... the infamous "not designed here" syndrome. But now the wisdom of this approach is being revealed. It's one reason Apple products can't be easily duplicated by other companies - Apple owns the IP, not the suppliers.
And R&D isn't an easy thing to account for with profit margins. So that 37% isn't as obscene as it may seem.
That said, 37%!!! wow!
eddd
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Dec 2001