AAPL Stock: 119.31 ( + 1.5 )

Printed from

Intel hints at 3.16GHz quad-core Xeon

updated 04:25 pm EDT, Mon July 16, 2007

Intel 45nm Xeon Leak

The very first Xeon processors built on Intel's 45-nanometer Penryn architecture have been revealed, according to a leaked memo circulated inside the semiconductor firm. The new chips, already nicknamed "Harpertown," will both represent Intel's first quad-core x86 chips to move beyond the 3GHz barrier while also improving the efficiency of the cores themselves. A top-end Xeon X5640 will peak at 3.16GHz, with at least 2.83GHz (E5440) and 2.5GHz (E5420) chips occupying the mid-range and a low-power 2.33GHz model (L5410) consuming only 50 watts of energy on average. All editions will have 12MB of level 2 cache versus the 8MB of today's CPUs, reducing the likelihood of bus or memory bottlenecks.

Dual-core processors will also be available, the note said. These simpler Xeons, called "Wolfdale," will reportedly have 6MB of cache (upgraded from 4MB) but make up for the lack of extra cores through clock speed and power draw: the 3.33GHz E5250 will consume 65 watts while the L5250 at 3.16GHz will need only 40 watts. Few dual-core CPUs will be available as the multi-core aware programs often run on Xeons will benefit more from four cores versus two, according to one Intel engineer.

Prices for the chips were not part of the leak but are expected to push the overall pricing downwards, making quad-core and faster dual-core processors more readily available. The fastest known Xeon today is the 3GHz X5365 quad-core model used first in the Mac Pro.

by MacNN Staff




  1. Jonaziz

    Joined: Dec 1969




  1. ViktorCode

    Joined: Dec 1969


    New Mac Pro?

    I hope Apple will refresh its Mac Pro line this year using these brand new CPUs. Mac Pro begs for update; having 1 GB of RAM preinstalled in workstation is a joke.

  1. IvoryTower

    Joined: Dec 1969


    re: new mac pro?

    While I agree that 1GB pre-installed is far too little for a such a machine, you DON'T want to pay Apple's prices for RAM ;) After buying a dual-dual 2.66, I swapped in 4x 1GB sticks of equivalent quality for about half of what Apple would have charged. IMO, I'd prefer the slight extra hassle of DIY vs. the exorbitant cost. And, I imagine most folks who buy the Pros will be rather versed in performing upgrades, so this becomes even more of a non-issue, IMO

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.


Network Headlines

Follow us on Facebook


Most Popular


Recent Reviews

Ultimate Ears Megaboom Bluetooth Speaker

Ultimate Ears (now owned by Logitech) has found great success in the marketplace with its "Boom" series of Bluetooth speakers, a mod ...

Kinivo URBN Premium Bluetooth Headphones

We love music, and we're willing to bet that you do, too. If you're like us, you probably spend a good portion of your time wearing ...

Jamstik+ MIDI Controller

For a long time the MIDI world has been dominated by keyboard-inspired controllers. Times are changing however, and we are slowly star ...


Most Commented