toggle

AAPL Stock: 111.78 ( -0.87 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

Errata: iPhone more secure than other phones

updated 02:00 pm EDT, Tue July 3, 2007

iPhone more secure

Errata, a well-known security consultation firm that provided in-depth analysis of the first Month of Apple Bugs (MoAB) project and has independently identified a number of device and OS flaws, thinks that the iPhone is inherently more secure than competing smartphones (such as those based on Windows Mobile or Symbian). Chief among the factors behind this claim is Apple's reluctance to put its iPhone software update mechanism in the hands of a wireless carrier, instead distributing patches through iTunes. Errata says "We've reported a (vulnerability) in a another smartphone 6 months ago that still hasn't gotten patched, mostly because that carrier doesn't want to. If Apple can push a fix for one of our bugs before this carrier fixes their bug, that might convince Wall Street that their strategy is better."

Still, because the iPhone runs OS X, Errata claims that would-be hackers have a head-start. The accumulated knowledge about the OS, gleaned from desktop operation, theoretically makes for a bigger target than Windows Mobile or Symbian. There are also some lingering questions about the iPhone that could have a significant impact on security: What ports are listening on the device? Does everything run with root access? What services will the device automatically connect to?




by MacNN Staff

POST TOOLS:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. testudo

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    Right,....

    "We've reported a (vulnerability) in a another smartphone 6 months ago that still hasn't gotten patched, mostly because that carrier doesn't want to. If Apple can push a fix for one of our bugs before this carrier fixes their bug, that might convince Wall Street that their strategy is better."

    So, their theory is that, if Apple patches one fix, their strategy is better because some carrier hasn't patched a certain unknown security hole? Because a sample of 1 is enough to base strategies over.

    And I would think it would be 'more secure' because, at the moment, there's no way to get anything onto it, so, by default, its harder to crack.

  1. Loren

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    BAD article title

    Think twice! I glanced at the headline and it seemed to say-

    "Whoops, we made a mistake in saying the iPhone is more secure." Come on, people! Wake up.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Dell AD211 Bluetooth speaker

For all of the high-priced, over-engineered Bluetooth speakers in the electronics market, there is still room for mass-market solution ...

VisionTek 128GB USB Pocket SSD

USB flash drives dealt the death blow to both the floppy and Zip drives. While still faster than either of the old removable media, sp ...

Kodak PixPro SL10 Smart Lens Camera

Smartphone imagery still widely varies. Large Megapixel counts don't make for a good image, and the optics in some devices are lackin ...

toggle

Most Commented