oh oh -- lookout it's those smashing iPhone guys in disguise . . . you gotta give'm credit for quick dissassembly, 'tho!

These "No Camera Phones" policies are ridiculous and short-sighted. If people wanted to take pictures of confidential material, they can smuggle in cameras a lot smaller than an iPhone.

Short-sighted? Love your idea of security. Hey, they can use smaller cameras, so we should just not care and allow all cameras.

Most cell phones have cameras, so I am sure this applies to all cell phones. If I bought an iPhone, I certainly would not take it into a government facility. Many secure sites actually ban personal cell phones

are forbidden, but any kind of device that will be able to record images or store data are allowed into secure areas. I know people that when you take a CD into a room they're working in, it doesn't come out unless it's going to the smelter. Even simple meeting rooms can have the ban on visual recording devices. Trust me, there are plenty of folks who could use this service.

Some people think it's ridiculous, however, imagine our enemies hacking into some poor sap's computer that just happens to work at the Skunk Works. C'mon, your not that dumb, are you?

Cameras in top secret or confidential organizations is Stupid!!!!!!!

"Some people think it's ridiculous, however, imagine our enemies hacking into some poor sap's computer that just happens to work at the Skunk Works. C'mon, your not that dumb, are you?"

I'm sure our enemies are going to take pictures with an iPhone, and not a tiny concealable camera. "C'mon, your not that dumb, are you?" [sic]

Banning camera phones doesn't stop corporate spying. It's completely inneffective at stopping corporate espionage, and thus a waste of time to enforce the policy. Policy enforcers would better use their time to ban taking photos and performing security checks of employees exposed to sensitive information.