05/03/2007, 8:05pm, EDT
Thursday, May 3rd
Editor quits after PC Mag kills Apple story [updated]
"McCracken said no way and walked after Crawford refused to compromise. Apparently Crawford also told editors that product reviews in the magazine were too critical of vendors, especially ones who advertise in the magazine, and that they had to start being nicer to advertisers," Wired wrote in its blog.
Crawford, who is a longtime friend of Jobs, was the former CEO of MacWorld and only started at PC World about a month ago, but the changes maybe pushing the already-blurring lines of advertising and editorial.
"When Crawford was working for the Mac magazine, Steve Jobs would call him up any time he had a problem with a story the magazine was running about Apple," a source told Wired.
"Everybody is so proud of Harry but we're devastated that he's gone," said the source. "This is no way to run a magazine. But unfortunately, this looks like an indication of what we've got in store (from the new boss)."
Officially, McCracken resigned after 12 years at the magazine and 16 years at publisher International Data Group citing over "disagreements with management," but declined to elaborate.
Update: While Crawford denied the allegations on his personal blog, other publications including CNET News.com have independently verified the initial report: "But three sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told CNET News.com that McCracken informed staffers in an afternoon meeting Wednesday that he decided to resign because Colin Crawford, senior vice president, online, at IDG Communications, was pressuring him to avoid stories that were critical of major advertisers."
"We have and will continue to run editorial and content that both praises and criticizes as appropriate without regard to the vendor relationship," Crawford wrote without criticizing McCracken.
Filed under: Apple
,
, 37
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
10. Apple is successful. 9. Apple is successful. 8. Apple is successful. 7. Apple is successful. 6. Apple is successful. 5. Apple is successful. 4. Apple is successful. 3. Apple is successful. 2. Apple is successful. 1. Apple is successful.
The point is that *we don't know* the full details, so we shouldn't be quick to judge either party here.