04/24/2007, 10:10am, EDT
Tuesday, April 24thAT&T pitching iPhone at business?
AT&T (formerly Cingular) hopes to expand the appeal of the iPhone to businesses, sources near the cell provider claim. Although the iPhone has been typically promoted as an entertainment device, the carrier has reportedly changed its billing and support systems for business to handle the Apple device for companies that want to deploy it on a wider scale. An AT&T representative declined to provide additional details, but the news has nevertheless prompted a backlash from analysts, many of whom point to the phone's non-expandability as a red flag for businesses.
Experts primarily referred to the device's lack of third-party software, which was imposed by Apple as an attempt to control the experience but may ultimately limit the phone's appeal to businesses, which frequently depend on Office Mobile and similar tools for workers who travel often.
"Companies like to extend corporate apps to the mobile space," said Current Analysis mobile phone researcher Avi Greengart. "And in order to do that, you need an open OS." He didn't rule out the possibility of software being added to help the iPhone's appeal in workplaces but warned not to expect any by the June release date.
Gartner analyst Ken Dulaney echoed the sentiment, noting that the choice of extra software for RIM's BlackBerry and the plurality of Windows Mobile smartphones made them better choices. He pointed out that hardware design, however, was at least as much of a problem for businesses. Most of the iPhone's design philosophy wouldn't be helpful to workers.
The lack of a replaceable battery is a potentially fatal flaw. "You'd be crazy to buy without that [option]," Dulaney commented, also noting that a separate media decoding processor might consume more energy than the sole CPU found in most phones.
The on-screen touch keypad might also make it difficult to dial while on the road, he said.
The collective criticism follows a similarly scathing response from Microsoft, which dismissed the iPhone as effectively useless to companies that needed extra software, suggesting instead that the handset would be a better choice as a media player than a productivity tool. Greengart agreed in his newer analysis, saying that companies who sign up with AT&T's business plans for the iPhone might be inadvertently pampering their employees with a media player they don't need.
"Could a company deploy this?" he asked. "They could, but they'd be paying for storage and for something intended for use as a consumer device."
,
, 11
,
,
,
,
, 
subscribe to comments
for this article
A scenario: You like the iPhone? how easy it is to use? how stable and powerful it seems? Try this Mac here. Ah, see how simple that business task was, and how seemlessly the necessary data moved to the iPhone? It was even easy to understand, wasn't it? Perhaps our business could benefit from such a smooth and simple environment...
You get the point.
Perhaps the move to keep the iPhone closed not only works to ensure seemeless hardware operability, but to have people to try and usee apps. designed by Apple. While a move like this wouldn't be completely benevolent, who's to say people wouldn't find they like the Apple apps. more? Perhaps this, like iTMS, is meant to sell more hardware?
Well, that might be true, but it would be really short-sighted. If you can't get the apps you need/want on the iphone, why would you buy it at all?
Our business purchased over 70 blackberry's last year and plan another purchase this year. I would love to have an iPhone.
Some are sure that the iPhone is only consumer device. It is a great consumer device but I don't understand their issue with it being a business device as well. There is a lot of potential and perhaps it would lead to other services that would be better supported by Apple servers.
Also, someone asked about cameras on the Apple campus. I once visited a friend at Apple and I innocently took out my camera in the lobby to take a group photo and was immediately stopped by security. In the lobby. I think there are no cameras.
As for inhouse apps, most of those are moving toward being web based so I don't see an issue with not being able to install any software you wish.