04/23/2007, 11:15am, EDT
Monday, April 23rd
Jobs likely to avoid criminal charges
A close review of the events which led to the grant in question revealed that the backdating was likely a clumsy attempt by Apple's board to reward Jobs for bringing the company back to its feet.
"When you start thinking about lying, cheating and stealing, there's a mental state that you know what you're doing is wrong," said former San Francisco-based federal prosecutor Jeffrey Bornstein, who is not involved in the Apple case. "If you don't appreciate that, it's very difficult for the government to show that you're a criminal."
Prosecutors face a difficult road if they are to base a securities fraud case against Apple's CEO on the backdating of his own grant, primarily because that grant was approved by Apple's board, not Jobs, legal experts who are familiar with the grant say.
"Jobs can take the defense, 'What do I know about the proper accounting for this transaction? I didn't keep a secret from anybody and assumed the accounting would be proper,'" said Stanford law professor and former SEC commissioner Joseph Grundfest. "That would seem to distinguish the Apple situation."
Filed under: Apple
,
, 5
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
since this article aproaches 'slander' and 'no new news exists about it'; why is macnn keep bringing this up every few weeks...
a fake witch hunt perhaps??
...each article always says Jobs is the victim of Apples board of directors mistake and Jobs makes a $1 salary...
sour grapes??
I'm not sure how you consider this article "slander". It's pretty straightforward reporting.