toggle

AAPL Stock: 112.94 ( + 1.16 )

Printed from http://www.macnn.com

Apple received 'cease & desist' over 1984 ad

updated 10:20 am EDT, Mon April 2, 2007

Apple's 1984 spoof redux

The political anti-Hilary Clinton spoof based on Apple's legendary 1984 television ad may be violating copyright laws and could face a lawsuit from the copyright holders of George Orwell's classic novel '1984'. Rosenblum Productions, which acquired the rights to the Orwellian imagery, said that it is "monitoring the situation," but was unclear whether it was focusing on the creator of the video, YouTube, or both parties. The company, however, said that it has defended its rights successfully at least twice before, including a cease and desist to Apple over the original SuperBowl ad more than 20 years ago. "When the Apple 'Big Brother' television commercial was aired during the 1984 Super Bowl telecast, we immediately objected to this unauthorized commercial use of the novel, and sent a 'cease-and-desist' letter both to Apple and to its ad agency," said Gina Rosenblum, president of Rosenblum Productions. "The commercial never aired on television again."




by MacNN Staff

POST TOOLS:

TAGS :

toggle

Comments

  1. rvhernandez

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    A Week Old Story...

    Like someone else said, it never aired again because it was dated. After January 24th it was useless. These people are bozos.

  1. Guest

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    Truly Orwellian

    Suing someone for a generic portrayal of totalitarianism? Have Rosenblum Productions never heard of irony?

  1. danviento

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    Some people

    will do anything to make a $.

  1. UberFu

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    well

    how come they didn't go after the folks who drummed up the movie Gattaca ?

    Or Demolition man ?

    or Minority Report ?

    or The Island ?

    or any other depiction of a totalitarian idea ?

    The Orwellians need to get over themselves_

  1. jumbojet

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    Hahahahaha....

    Successful? It's the most well-known and replayed ad in this history of Television. Good work, there.

    And, by the way, how does it borrow from the novel, except for the part that says "1984 won't be like 1984?" The man on the screen does not look like Big Brother (Orwell's Big Brother has a mustache in the novel), there is no scene where a woman rushes into a theatre and smashes his face, nor are there any other such similarities.

  1. ZinkDifferent

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    They are just...

    ...re-enacting the concepts they acquired -- clearly, Rosenblum wouldn't know 'irony' if it hit them with a 2x4.

    It's an insignificant copyright holder, trying to fabricate significance by riding on the coattails of controversy. What else is new.

  1. Jeronimo2000

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    total (-itarian) BS

    "The commercial never aired on television again."

    Oh really?

    In the days after the original airing of the ad every major news programme on TV reported on it, most of them replaying the ad in its entirity.

    Seems that Big Brother is a bit braindead.

  1. rahrens

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    interesting

    If this ever went to court, it would be interesting, because a book's success can undermine its ability to control derivative content. The term "1984" has, because of the book's success, become almost synonymous with totalitarianism, and by that year, could be said to have entered the national vocabulary much as terms like "Kleenex" or "Xerox" had.

    Besides, as a number, or the descriptor of a year, the term "1984" could be argued to have no copyright in and of itself.

    It would be a hard sell, besides, as the other poster above noted, by 24 January, the ad had become dated, and no longer needed to be run anyway.

  1. broohaha22

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    stupid

    It's quite obvious that all people are stupid.

    snuffleupagus

  1. MacPhoenix

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    re: interesting

    Your point is valid, but for a small detail. Titles can never be copyrighted. "1984" the title is not under copyright protection. The book itself is. They're not trying to protect the term "1984," but the ideas in the book.

    It's obviously ridiculous on the face of it, though, as everyone has said. Apple aired the advertisement once by design, not because of some idiotic claims of copyright infringement. It was guerilla marketing at its finest. Apple pays a(n extraordinary) sum once during the Super Bowl, and then lets every news outlet replay the ad for free for the next month.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Dell AD211 Bluetooth speaker

For all of the high-priced, over-engineered Bluetooth speakers in the electronics market, there is still room for mass-market solution ...

VisionTek 128GB USB Pocket SSD

USB flash drives dealt the death blow to both the floppy and Zip drives. While still faster than either of the old removable media, sp ...

Kodak PixPro SL10 Smart Lens Camera

Smartphone imagery still widely varies. Large Megapixel counts don't make for a good image, and the optics in some devices are lackin ...

toggle

Most Commented