02/06/2007, 6:20pm, EST
Tuesday, February 6th
Norway responds to Jobs' open DRM letter
Responding to Apple's chief about the Cupertino-based company's closed iPod/iTunes ecosystem, the senior advisor says Jobs' claim that consumers aren't locked into using Apple's own products when they purchase music from the iTunes store is a contradiction, since the point and function of FairPlay -- Apple's digital rights management (DRM) -- is to lock the music purchased from the iTunes store to work exclusively on iPods.
"[Steve Jobs] also goes on to turn the whole issue on its head by stating iPod owners are not locked into [the] iTunes Music Store - the issue our complaint [addresses] is of course the opposite, iTunes Music Store customers are locked to the iPod."
Apple's CEO argued that Apple, Microsoft, and Sony all compete with proprietary systems and that music purchased from each store will only play on that company's hardware. Waterhouse effectively expressed that Apple is not free from fault simply because it is not alone in its proprietary ventures, and that the iTunes store as well as other closed music offerings are unfair to consumers.
"The fact remains that both iTunes Music Store and others are unfair to consumers no matter how many download services follow the proprietary approach."
Addressing the delegation of blame to record companies, Waterhouse admits that music labels need to carry their own weight to ensure fairness for customers at the global level.
"It's quite clear that the record companies carry their share of the responsibility for the situation that the consumer [is] stuck in," exclaimed Waterhouse. "However no matter what agreements [the] iTunes Music Store [has] entered into, they're still the company that's selling music to the consumers and are responsible for offering the consumer a fair deal according to Norwegian law."
Jobs concluded his open letter by stating that he fully embraces free music, and that Apple would sell unprotected tracks if it were possible to do so.
"If the big four music companies would license Apple their music without the requirement that it be protected with a DRM, we would switch to selling only DRM-free music on our iTunes store," Jobs said in his letter published earlier today.
Waterhouse viewed Jobs' conclusion as a potential good sign that Apple is indeed willing to "kick the lock" in technology from the iTunes/iPod combination.
"This is really good news - news that should be put into action as soon as possible to bring us all one important step closer to a well functioning digital society."
Filed under: industry
Other story tags: digital music/video
,
, 79
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
No one forces you to buy an Ipod, No one forces you to buy from itunes. people do it as it just works and they like it.
If you dont like it dont use it .. go elsewhere.... people are free to choose and they choose Ipods... get over it
Sincerely, A Norwegian
Mr. Waterhouse, is now just confused. iTunes Music Store customers are NOT locked to the iPod. You can buy iTunes music without iPod.
Of course you have to burn them to music CD to use it on anything else... I dont see how that makes you locked into iPod.
Also ITMS is a service that you could use with iPod.
Is it hard for him to connect the dots? Does he even know what computer is?
Who's pushing this whole issue?
Is there public outcry about how unfair Apple's iTunes Store is toward its customers? Or... Is this something the government is pursuing on its own, in the so-called "best interests" of its citizens?