Verizon rejected Apple's iPhone terms
updated 01:35 am EST, Mon January 29, 2007
iPhone rejected by Verizon
Apple's "rich financial terms" and other demands were the primary reasons that Verizon Wireless, the No. 2 cellphone carrier in the US, passed on the chance to be the exclusive distributor of the iPhone almost two years ago. The USA Today on Monday reported that Apple wanted a percentage of the monthly cellphone fees as well as a say over how and where iPhones could be sold. The Cupertino-based company, who eventually announced an exclusive agreement with Cingular, demanded control of the relationship with iPhone customers, according to Jim Gerace, a Verizon Wireless vice president. "We said no. We have nothing bad to say about the Apple iPhone. We just couldn't reach a deal that was mutually beneficial." According to the report, collapse in the talks with Verizon led directly to Apple's deal with Cingular, which is reportedly a five-year exclusive agreement for US distribution.
Apple CEO Steve Jobs insisted that he have hard control over iPhone distribution as well as sole discretion on warranty and replacement issues. The discretion may have put other Verizon distribution partners such as Wal-Mart and Best Buy at a disadvantage, Verizon's exec claimed. "That would have put our own distribution partners at a disadvantage" to Apple and Verizon stores, Gerace said.
Responding to the customer support portion of the report, Cingular reiterated that it would take responsibility for any wireless support. Mark Siegel, a Cingular spokesman said Cingular would field calls related to the wireless service. "I don't want to leave the impression that these (iPhone) customers are not ours. They are."











Yep sounds like apple
01/29, 02:09am reply
If only the cancer became terminal
devilla101
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Dec 2003
Wow
01/29, 04:09am reply
That's not a very nice thing to say... you're an a**.
sixcolors
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Oct 2001
devilla101
01/29, 05:05am reply
Sounds like you're too much of an idiot to afford anything but moronic comments.
jarod
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Apr 2005
Sucks to be verizon...
01/29, 07:27am reply
Cell companies are convinced that they have to send a squadron of pixies out to carry every message, and erect a new towe for every phone. Or at least their fees seem to indicate. Build-out is over. Start charging what the service is worth, or someone else will punch thru this nonsense and take your lunch money. I'm surprised the vp gave his name - it'll be interesting to see where he is if the iPhone takes off...
jpellino
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Oct 1999
Really a bad call
01/29, 08:16am reply
on Verizon's part. I am a current VerizonWireless customer who, when the contract ends in Novermber, will not be renewing their service. Their loss. Too bad because they really have been an easy company to deal with, though I hate they lock out certain features of the Treo 650 I own and that there are no rollover minutes.
mgpalma
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Sep 2000
5 year exclusive
01/29, 08:52am reply
I thought Cingular was on a 2 year exclusive agreement, not five. Any one have facts on this? I don't totally trust MacNN's reporting accuracy.
lemuel777
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jul 2004
Thank God!
01/29, 08:58am reply
The *real* dealbreaker was that Verizon wanted Apple to disable the really useful features so Verizon could then sell them back to their suckers, I mean, customers. :-)
People grouse about Cingular, but at least Cingular doesn't cripple their phones.
phillymjs
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jun 2000
apple and sprint?
01/29, 09:12am reply
is there any chance that the iPhone could come to sprint some day?
edguzman
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Sep 2006
CDMA vs GSM
01/29, 09:40am reply
I really don't see how Apple could have gone with Verizon - Verizon doesn't do GSM, right? Without GSM, the iPhone couldn't be a "world phone" and compete in all markets, just in the US, right? I guess Apple could have made a CDMA + GSM phone, if they wanted to, but with an "exclusive" deal, this would have been really hard to pull off...
Ashari
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Nov 2003
5 year for Cingular
01/29, 10:05am reply
The 5-year agreement for Cingular means no other carrier in the US will be able to sell it until this expires. This has been reported elsewhere (outside of MacNN/Electronista universe), although always with the reservation that it's unofficial (neither Apple nor Cingular want to disclose the terms).
You'll be signing a 2-year contract with Cingular when you buy this phone at $500 (or $600 for the 8-GB model).
As for Verizon, since it is big and popular, it is no surprise that Apple wanted to work with them. Neither is it a surprise that Verizon didn't want to work with Apple; instead, they just wanted Apple to do whatever Verizon wanted. There are manufacturers (Nokia/Samsung/LG/Moto/Sony-Ericsson/Palm/etc.) that will painstakingly design a handset, then cripple it at the whim of a carrier, just to get to play in the market. Apple will never be one of them. Unfortunately, these other makers have made carriers so used to the level of control over hardware they now have that it took Cingular (dare I say their vision?) to sign such an exclusive deal (on Apple's terms, no less) without ever seeing even a prototype. While I was never a major fan of Cingular, I really hope they get rewarded here by extra 10 million subscribers by the year's end.
vasic
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: May 2005