toggle

AAPL Stock: 510.4 ( + 0.94 )

PC Magazine tests Apple's iPhone

updated 12:55 pm EST, Thu January 11, 2007

PC Mag tests iPhone


PC Magazine was allowed 10 minutes to handle Apple's new iPhone one day after it was introduced on Tuesday morning by company CEO Steve Jobs at the Macworld Conference & Expo inside San Francisco's Moscone Center. "Ten minutes isn't much, but I can safely say that the iPhone is even more impressive than it appeared during the Jobs keyote, and that's saying something," said PC Magazine's Cade Metz. Metz was granted a brief meeting with Apple executives on Wednesday afternoon where he handled and used the phone for the brief period, saying that the device was "an absolute revelation." "Seeing the device in action is one thing—but actually using it is another," Metz said. "Each application is impressive in its own right, from photo-management software to the Safari Web browser, but it's the overall touch-screen interface that takes the breath away."

Citing the on-screen keyboard as the only portion of the phone he had trouble using, Metz added that "it's obviously the sort of thing that takes some practice -- but it was impressive nonetheless."

Despite his short 10-minute interlude with the iPhone, Metz says it was obvious that the MultiTouch technology works as Jobs said it would. "With a tap of the finger, I opened the photo management tool. With another, I opened a photo. With a swipe of the finger, I moved the photo back and forth. And by placing two fingers on the screen and moving them back and forth, I could zoom in and out."

Metz adds that it was just as easy to scroll through a full size Web page and zoom in or out. Instantly browsing and accessing songs as well as videos and contacts in much the same way, Metz was offered no earphones and so couldn't listen to the songs on the device. Switching the device from portrait to landscape mode by turning the iPhone apparently only works in one direction, and typing with the on-screen keyboard requires some practice, according to Metz.

"At first, I typed with two hands—gripping the device on each side and taping a thumb on each end of the keyboard—but I was only about 50 percent accurate. Then I switched to hunting and pecking with a single index finger, and though this was (slightly) more accurate, it was much slower," Metz. said. "My guess is that after some practice, you could get pretty efficient with two thumbs. But the keyboard is obviously something that takes some time to get used to. The rest of the interface requires no practice whatsoever."

With his last minute remaining Metz phoned his editor in New York, who said the sound quality was poor or "kinda fuzzy." Metz notes, however, that he was in an area of the Moscone Center where cellular reception is less than ideal.

"And then they took it away from me. I didn't have a chance to try Google Maps or the Apple Widgets or the visual voice mail. But it's the new interface that really caught the attention this week—and it's everything Jobs says it is."


by MacNN Staff

TAGS :

 Apple
toggle

Comments

  1. ricardogf

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2003

    0

    Amazing Apple

    In other words, Apple rules again...the phone industry is about to be reinvented...there is simply NO competitor out there.

    MS is dead, Nokia is dead, Palm is dead...thanks Apple!

  1. malax

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2006

    0

    impressive

    It's nice to hear from someone who actually had a hands-on experience. We all know how slick something can look in a demo. On the other hand there were Apple executives present, so they may have have set up a low powered version of Steve's reality distortion field. In fact, that's probably what made the phone call fuzzy--interference from the RDF.

  1. bobolicious

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2002

    0

    RE: AMAZING APPLE

    ...funny now that I know the timelag & cost I'm probably going to go out & buy a gsm treo until the iPhone is actually available at a price & service that I won't be afraid to carry around & risk losing...

    The interface does look very cleverly designed...

  1. jpellino

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Oct 1999

    0

    refreshing...

    ... that they didn't simply say "it's a dead technology because it won't run windows". This must be one impressive unit!

  1. Monde

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2004

    0

    Nice device but...

    The cingular link is the weak part of the deal. Open this jem up to the other carriers out there and I'm sure market share will soar.

  1. Guest

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 1999

    0

    Landscape Keyboard

    Any thoughts on why the keyboard cannot be used in landscaoe mode a la Blackberyy?

  1. PBG4 User

    Senior User

    Joined: Feb 2001

    0

    Re: Palm is Dead

    Palm allows 3rd party software. The iPhone doesn't, which is a deal breaker for me.

  1. rtamesis

    Dedicated MacNNer

    Joined: Jan 2000

    0

    3rd party software

    The iPod originally didn't allow third party software either, but due to demand, apple eventually opened it up. If demand is vociferous enough from both developers and consumers, Apple will eventually allow other software to run on the iPhone.

  1. Ashari

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 2003

    0

    re: pbg4 user

    Palm allows 3rd party software. The iPhone doesn't, which is a deal breaker for me.

    I'm sure that Apple will offer an official channel with which to deliver software for the phone. They are already doing this with the games for the iPod....

  1. zl9600

    Forum Regular

    Joined: Oct 2003

    0

    it's a V1 product, guys

    I think rtamesis is right. It's running an OS, it's running widgets. It will behoove this product to be opened up at some point. But I bet you dollars to donuts the reason this phone was so locked in secrecy is that around four different companies had known fully about it. Apple, google, Cingular, Yahoo.

    And that's why it's not available til June--it has everything to do with the FCC requiring you to basically tell them all about the phone in order to get approval. And that, my friend, is public information.

    It was brilliant on Apple's part, mostly in part to the billion or so dollars in buzz the stock price got.

    As for the carrier, the Cingular link was necessary. You CANT have visual voicemail, one of the biggest pros of this piece, without a phone company willing to work with you on it. Maybe Jobs did approach others, maybe not. See first paragraph.

    GSM, a superior (by miles) technology to Verizon and Sprint's dated CDMA technology, was required to make this a truly global phone (unlike the former companies). That leaves Cingular or T-Mobile.

    Apple I believe would have loved to have been able to control their own phone system and buy wireless in bulk from someone, but I think the phone companies saw through that. There is only so much they wanted to give.

    And FWIW, Verizon is known for making phone mfrs cripple their phones. I for one am thankful they didn't go down that road.

    Smart move on both sides. You can blame the FCC for the state of cellular companies controlling manufacturing like they do and the lack of cooperation.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed