Greenpeace is all about sensationalism. They stopped actually helping the environment years ago.

If Apple had the same products but were not as popular, Greenpeace would ignore them.

An article just came out about how wrong Greenpeace was about Apple's green program as it shows that Apple is one of the top sellers of green laptops in the world.

There beating a broken stick and nobody is listening.

please put GreenShit out of their misery once and for all!!

said it best in Ace Ventura when he said "Laahhh-Hew.. Za-heerrsss..."

... as long as they're correct. The truth is, I don't know enough about Apple's disposal practices to comment. If Greenpeace's information is accurate, I fully agree Apple should change their behavior. Why would any company have the right to pollute 3rd world countries when safer alternatives are available?

If Apple had the same products but were not as popular, Greenpeace would ignore them.

Well, if they had the same products but not as popular, they'd have less sales, which in turn would lead to less of whatever Greenpeace is complaining about, which in turn would mean there'd probably be bigger fish to fry, if they fried fish.

For safety reasons one should be driving while driving. If one must place or receive calls one should use a handsfree device, such as voice activated speakerphone or bluetooth wireless headset. One should also drive defensively and expect the unexpected.

Yes, and one shouldn't be eating, shaving, reading, brushing their teeth, flossing, applying makeup, feeding kids, watching DVDs, playing with the radio, using the cellphone, searching for songs on the ipod, etc, etc, etc. Of course they do (some of the above could be argued can be done without removing attention from the road).

But not having any tactile feel to a device means you HAVE to look at it to see what you're doing.

please read this article about the truth behind greenpeace's claims: http://www.roughlydrafted.com/RD/Home/ABC6DFDA-9DE9-4EA8-A269-65EAAB628676.html

bottom line is that they are targeting apple because it gets better publicity for them than any actual environmental truths. their report is based on whether companies promise to try to do better environmentally, not any measure of actual environmental performance. on their own testing, they found the apple laptop to be among the best environmentally, yet because apple refused to make any promises, they were ranked lower.

I won't be preached at by a pack of proto-terrorists. The lot of them should be dragged in the streets,

what the %$#@%$ are you talking about? take your meds.