toggle

AAPL Stock: 502.6 ( + 9.18 )

Labels test MP3 distribution waters

updated 11:30 am EST, Thu December 7, 2006

Labels test MP3 waters


Record labels are toying with the idea of distributing their musical catalogs without Digital Rights Management (DRM) restrictions, which would allow them to circumvent Apple's iTunes Music Store while still enabling users to play their tracks on the Cupertino-based company's massively popular iPod. Labels such as EMI have traditionally stuck with protected formats that restrict songs to supported playback devices, causing some backlash from consumers who believe they should be able to play music they purchase on any device they own. Now major music labels are starting to make songs available as MP3s as part of an experiment to gauge demand for music that is playable on any portable playback device, according to the Associated Press. EMI is offering Norah Jones and rock band Relient K via Yahoo's online music service as MP3s, presumably to test the waters of unrestricted music.


by MacNN Staff

print
email
(6)

TAGS :

 iPod, industry

Related Articles

Recent Articles

toggle

Comments

  1. ZinkDifferent

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2005

    0
    12/07, 01:16pm | report spam | Reply |

    What's the point...

    So, after forcing Apple to include DRM in order to be allowed to carry their songs, they are now considering offering them as unprotected MP3s through competing stores to 'get Apple', or what?

    Apple has delivered a protection for content that is both flexible, and secure - which is the opposite of everything the labels have tried - yet, here these idiots are trying to stab Apple, again, in the back with what amounts to more failures.

    Sure, I'll download an unprotected MP3 - Oh, what's that? You want $1.99 per track? Sorry, F/U, I'll just download it from p2p, or iTunes, then!

  1. Buran

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: May 2000

    0
    12/07, 02:34pm | report spam | Reply |

    Someone always complains

    Not stabbing you personally, but this is proof that people will complain no matter what the labels do.

    People complained when the labels offered DRM-laden downloads as too restrictive.

    Now, there are complaints when the labels offer the freely-usable MP3 tracks that have been requested by many people for years!

    And I'm sure there would be complaints if the labels, fed up with being complained at both ways, pulled the catalogs entirely ... or if they went electronic-only and stopped offering CDs/tapes/LPs ...

  1. resuna

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2005

    0
    12/07, 03:01pm | report spam | Reply |

    And what about eMusic?

    They're offering it through "Yahoo's online music service"?

    They ought to "test the waters" with eMusic, which is already offering independant and minor-label music in MP3 format. A few major label songs, and they'd have some serious competition for iTunes...

  1. Deal

    Mac Enthusiast

    Joined: Apr 2001

    0
    12/07, 06:17pm | report spam | Reply |

    the only serious comp...

    The only serious competition will come in the form of "easy to use", and that means easy download, on computer organization and uploading to player.

    Nobody has all of that in one package which is why nobody's is as easy as Apple.

  1. McDave

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2006

    0
    12/07, 07:54pm | report spam | Reply |

    This has to be illegal..

    To force Apple to incorporate DRM but sell un-protected through other services, can't be right!

    I don't see the problem with DRM, I'd rather have it with a 1-click, auto-syncing store that has everything than an open format but fragmented & awkward 'service' - it's just choice for the sake of choice.

  1. eddd

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Dec 2001

    0
    12/08, 01:00pm | report spam | Reply |

    very odd indeed

    I guess they figure that the channel and paradigms are now in place, so there is less fear of pirating? I think they're wrong... I am in close contact with a number of college students, and pirating is still the primary way they get their music. They fill hard drives with the stuff. If the record labels drop all DRM, the message will be that the music is free. It's the wrong message, of course, but I guarantee I'll start hearing arguments that "the music labels don't care because they've removed copyright" or some other rationalization.

    Why can't the labels leave well enough alone and put their energies elsewhere?

    One good note for Apple... this whole iTMS thing is really just an option for them... the success of the iPod is independant of the iTMS. It's the cool factor, the great design and the function with iTunes that keeps people buying these things, not the music store. And Apple makes money on the iPod, not on music sales. So let them muck around with the channel... Apple will be fine.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed

 

Popular News