10/19/2006, 10:15am, EDT
Thursday, October 19th
Apple US marketshare surges 32%
HP regained the number one position for global PC market share, while Dell shipments fell 7.1 percent in the U.S. to 32.1 percent--still allowing Dell to retain its no. 1 position in the country. HP market share in the U.S. grew from 21.2 percent to 23 percent, bringing the global PC sales leader into second place in the U.S. behind Dell. Gateway follows HP with 6.4 percent share in the U.S., and Toshiba trails Apple with 5.1 percent market share.
HP holds 16.3 percent of global PC shipments. Dell follows HP with 16.1 percent, while Lenovo lays claim to 7.5 percent of the global PC market. Acer boasts 5.9 percent share worldwide, compared to Toshiba's 4.3 percent, rounding out the top five global PC leaders, according to AppleInsider.
Gartner said worldwide PC shipments totaled 59.1 million units in the third quarter of 2006, resulting in a 6.7 percent increase over last year's same period. Interestingly, the U.S. PC market realized a year-over-year decline of 2 percent, marking the first decline in PC shipments since the second quarter of 2002.
Filed under: Apple
,
, 18
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
it seems the halo effect has finally paid dividends. but i wouldn't limit it to just that. windows security weakness is likely a factor. ilife may be swaying some users. industrial design could be playing a part. boot camp & parallel's fexibility. etc..
now the halo from users buying macs and running windows, and then using OS X.. that will be the halo and further driving force.
not that the iPod didnt have anything to do with it.. it certainly played it's part well, but I cant see the halo effect reallly working from mp3 player to computer.
just my opinion.. argue at will.
Well, we all knew that 'once you try Mac, you never look back'. We just needed something to convince all those people. Who knew that the Intel switch would finally do it?
Will anybody wake these people up from their hypnotic trance?
I can't tell you how many people I've heard make some remark about why people bother with the 'Mac platform' if it is only 5% of the market. It might only be 5% of the sales per quarter, but is much more than 5% of 'in use computers'.
Let me give an example. Lets say that some new car maker comes on the scene, Qwerty Car Company. They have a really great deal and put their cars up for sale. They catch on well, and in Q4 2006, they capture a 10% 'market share'. So, does this mean that now 10% of the cars on the road are Querty cars? Not at all!
Now true, if sales hold at a percentage for a long time (longer than the life of the product)... AND both products have the same length of useful life.... AND people are buying and using the equipment for generally the same purposes, etc.... then the sales 'market share' starts to have more meaning. However, I would argue that Macs and PCs are not equal in this respect. For example, I have a PC in my house that runs MythTV and does nothing but be my HTPC. I don't buy M$ Word or Photoshop for it. This is just one example. How about the 3000 Dells that some company bought for POS terminals? Sure, this happens with Macs as well, but less often.
I think this is great news... but people need to understand that 'sales market share' is not the same as share of the computer market.
-Steve