09/26/2006, 4:50pm, EDT
Tuesday, September 26th
Apple's Schiller on stage at Intel IDF
"The industry is going through the most profound shift in decades, moving to an era where performance and energy efficiency are critical in all market segments and all aspects of computing," Otellini said. "The solution begins with the transistor and extends to the chip and platform levels."
Citing recent trends, Otellini showed how processing power is becoming more relevant than ever. The advent of new operating systems, more lifelike games, online video and high- definition video continue to drive the need for more processing power. A single You Tube stream today will hobble a PC from just a few years ago, said Otellini. "As we move to high definition video, users will need eight times greater performance just for encoding."
Core 2 Duo is fastest ramping Intel product
"More than ever processing power matters, even as the need to reduce heat, extend battery life, and reduce electricity costs in data centers becomes more critical," Intel's CEO told developers. "Silicon technology is at the heart of the solution. It is how we get there."
When it comes to performance and energy efficiency, Intel's new Core micro-architecture and flagship Intel Core 2 Duo processor have set a new standard for the industry, Otellini said. He showed where Core2 Duo benchmarks led across a wide range of applications and said it was now the fastest-ramping product in the company's history, with 5 million units shipped since it was introduced less than 60 days ago.
"With Core2 Duo we have the best performance, from the thinnest notebook to dual processor servers, and we are very pleased with the way this product is ramping."
Filed under: industry
,
, 3
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
I thought about that, but they were basically at a stand-still stuck with G4 processors. Intel allowed Apple to move forward and increase speed and technology without having to make backward design compromises.
They held off on that redesign until IBM flashed their Brainiac P4-like G5 CPU at them. While the Netburst and G5 architectures stagnated both Intel and Freescale went back to the drawing board... Intel rehashed the P6 core (used in the Pentium Pro, PII, and PIII) to producethe Core series, and Freescale harnessed the G4 Core to a new bus design that was even more aggressive than Intel's.
Alas, Apple staked the e600 and e700 in the heart and went off with Intel. Personally, I'd much rather be writing on an MPC8461D-based Powerbook than the Core Duo in this Macbook Pro. Full compatibility with existing software, including Palm Desktop (which was almost a deal-killer and I'm not sure I shouldn't have gone with the last gen G4 powerbooks instead even now) and dual 768 MHz memory busses would have given Core a run for its money.