Text Size

Apple's new iMacs offer more and less

updated 07:45 pm EDT, Thu September 7, 2006

Apple's new iMac lineup

The new 24-inch iMac has a few surprises, including an an upgradeable graphics card (through the use of a MXM PCI Express connector), a FireWire 800 port (thus reducing the number of available FireWire 400 ports to one), an improved 24-watt speakers (twice that of its 17- and 20-inch iMac siblings), a better NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT graphics card, and new 2.1 surround; meanwhile, users note that Apple's low-end 17-inch iMac, which is available at the lower price of $999, trades features for the the lower price when compared to the higher-end models--including offering a low-end integrated Intel graphics card (rather than the ATI GPUs used in the other models), a Combo drive (rather than a SuperDrive in other models), a smaller 2MB Level-2 cache (vs 4MB in other models), and no Bluetooth or Apple Remote. Readers note that the low-end $999 iMac is simply the previously available education-only model with a faster processor. [updated]

 
Previous Comments

Decent computer for $999

09/07, 08:26pm reply

I think it's great there's a $999 iMac again. My only complaint with the configuration is lack of a superdrive. I think this model should lose the airport and gain the superdrive. Budget users might not think they want to make a DVD video, but they'll sure appreciate the drive when it's time to back stuff up.

Very cool about Apple re-affirming a commitment to FW800.

mitchcohen

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2005

0

$999 iMac is not new

09/07, 08:31pm reply

The $999 iMac is just the education iMac with a faster proc. Everything else is identical and therefore, it has not lost anything as it was never there to begin with.

Rosyna

Forum Regular

Joined: Aug 2001

0

That just sounds stupid.

09/07, 08:48pm reply

"... users note that Apple's low-end 17-inch iMac [...] lacks some of the features of the higher-end model"

Oh, really?? I mean, duh. What a surprise, the low-end model is inferior to the higher-end model. What will they think of next? :-)

Jeronimo2000

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2001

0

The low end iMac

09/07, 09:01pm reply

This is simply the replacement for the education model of the first generation Intel iMac, but now it's available to the general public.

It's exactly the same thing they did with the eMac: introduce it first for education purchases only, then make it available to everyone.

Michelle Steiner

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Nov 1999

0

not just faster

09/07, 09:42pm reply

The lowest end iMac not only has a faster processor, it's also using the Core 2 Duo, not the Core Duo, so it's a whole new processor. Using the wording of "faster" just makes it seem like it's had a small bump in speed, versus a change in processor.

AquaX

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: May 2005

0

09/08, 07:49am reply

I thought the upgradeable graphics in the 24" iMac was far more interesting than the poverty spec 17" iMac.. Shame tho that some bright spark at Macnn saw fit to link to a french web page about it. I mean i know 'Rendezvous' got renamed to 'Bonjour' but that doesnt mean we can all speak it!

Grrr

Grizzled Veteran

Joined: Jun 2001

0

Re: not just faster

09/08, 11:52am reply

he lowest end iMac not only has a faster processor, it's also using the Core 2 Duo, not the Core Duo, so it's a whole new processor. Using the wording of "faster" just makes it seem like it's had a small bump in speed, versus a change in processor.

So what? What's the end difference in the computer? Oh, its 'faster'.

testudo

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2001

0

Re: •

09/08, 11:55am reply

I thought the upgradeable graphics in the 24" iMac was far more interesting than the poverty spec 17" iMac..

Just because someone on a web-site says its upgradable doesn't make it so. It uses a slot, but without drivers, what exactly are you planning on sticking in there (Apple is not touting the graphics as upgradable).

Shame tho that some bright spark at Macnn saw fit to link to a french web page about it. I mean i know 'Rendezvous' got renamed to 'Bonjour' but that doesnt mean we can all speak it!

First, its not about "speaking" French, it would be about "reading" French. Big difference. If the link was to a video in French, then that would be "understanding" French (or "listening and comprehending" French). Speaking is only needed if you are the one doing the conversation.

Second, it doesn't seem to bother you, though, that you assume everyone can read English when they put up links to those sites?

testudo

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2001

0

Re: that just sounds...

09/08, 12:04pm reply

Oh, really?? I mean, duh. What a surprise, the low-end model is inferior to the higher-end model. What will they think of next? :-)

Its not stupid, its just Mac-users being Mac-users :-). I mean, I know mid and high-end models tend to have the same features, but the low-end models are always lacking something (combo drive vice superdrive, for example), as well as slower here or smaller there. Maybe its just the amount of differences that made the users go "Sure its cheaper, but it has less features! WTF is that!?!?!"

But now that I've written it, it does seem kind of stupid.

testudo

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2001

0

re: testudo

09/08, 12:23pm reply

"Second, it doesn't seem to bother you, though, that you assume everyone can read English when they put up links to those sites?"

How stupid can you be. Besides the fact that the whole world learns english in school now, we are talking about links in an English article. In an article written in English, why should you assume otherwise than that links would also be to articles written in English.

chadpengar

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Oct 2001

0

Popular News