toggle

AAPL Stock: 509.46 ( + 6.86 )

Napster loses subscribers, future uncertain

updated 10:55 am EDT, Fri August 4, 2006

Napster loses subscribers


Napster's falling subscription base may be the first sign that the struggling company is ready for sale. On a conference call with analysts, Napster told anlaysts that its future was not as bright as previously thought and that it had lost about 7 percent of its subscriber base as it focused on promoting a new free Web site. Reuters repors that Chief Executive Officer Chris Gorog would not rule out a sale of the company. "We do not have our heads in the sand regarding an M&A (merger and acquisition) transaction. We continue to receive a lot of interest in the company. We will always carefully weigh any valuation alternative against the opportunity and risk associated with continuing as a stand-alone company," Gorog told analysts on a conference call. While facing the a growing prospect of a sale, The company said it was still looking for a "working business model"--a bad thing for the company's operations, the CEO acknowledged.

"Napster's still trying to find a working business model, which is bad from an operating standpoint. But we see an increased likelihood the company will consider a sale, especially since management mentioned it on the call," said Kit Spring, analyst with Stifel Nicolaus & Co Inc.

The company reported a loss of subscribers in higher education. As of June 30, Napster's total subscriber base was 512,000, including 4,000 university-paid subscriptions; however, excluding university, the number of paid subscribers grew 26 percent year-over-year.

Despite a rise in revenue, Napster reported a net loss of $9.8 million for the first fiscal quarter compared with a year-earlier loss of $19.9 million, according to the report. Napster's revenue increased from $21 million to $28.1 million.


by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. boris_cleto

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2002

    0

    Why?

    Why would any company want to buy a failing company with a failing business model?

  1. IQ78

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2006

    0

    dont be retarded...

    You are asking why anyone would want to buy a failing company with a failing business model? Are you serious? Were you just born yesterday? Geez.... The reason is...

    Well... it's obvious. Simply stated, when a company is for sale people consider buying it as long as it has promise or capital for pennies on the dollar. And Napster neither has promise or a lot of capital. So, then... can't ... ahhhh... well.. oh never mind.

  1. ZinkDifferent

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2005

    0

    They will never sell...

    ...not until the company has lost any and all perceived value, and not until Chris Gorog's managemnet accumen has managed to completely obliterate a brand and a company that could have made a lot of money.

    Example - Real's Harmony has gone into jukeboxes, a brilliant business model, and perfectly suited to a subscription model. A brilliant business model to leverage the resources they have. Great software on those jukeboxes, too, and anywhere they are, they are constantly playing.

    Napster could have done the same - but refused. Furthermore, Napster could have embraced the Mac users, by at least not shutting them out - instead, Mac users were a running joke with management, and only recently (under increasing pressure) were Mac users even 'allowed' to access parts of Napster, instead of being shut out with a 'go away' screen.

    Lastly, Napster's business model (if you want to call it that) is classic bait-and-switch, trying to sucker people into the demo subscription, and then making it as hard as possible to unsubscribe, kinda like the health club of music stores.

    It's not that Napster is losing subscribers - it's that they finally have to admit they are, amidst their phenomenal financial losses that seem to have no end to them...

    So, recalling their failed advertising campaign - yeah, Napster, I did the math -- and so do any potential suitors.

  1. typoon

    Addicted to MacNN

    Joined: Oct 1999

    0

    Wonder what he has to say

    I wonder what the CEO Me Gorog has to say now? I remember him a few years ago badmouthing Jobs and iTunes Come on let's hear what you've got to say now...

  1. chas_m

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    BWAHAHAHAHA

    Wow, they sure do couch their BS in some nice five-dollar words, don't they?

    I am SO AMUSED by clueless business types that believe that ANY WORD that is on the public's lips a lot therefore has value even if you change EVERYTHING about said concept.

    Napster meant FREE MUSIC FILES to everyone who used it. Nothing more, nothing less. You can't change that "business model" and have the word "Napster" mean anything, so there is NO WAY to make money off of it except by an AD-SUPPORTED free service. Period.

    buh-bye, Napster.

  1. bigpoppa206

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jun 2003

    0

    Now if...

    only the same exact thing happens to Microsoft in the next 5 years after they've tried the same thing....sigh.

  1. dpaanlka

    Junior Member

    Joined: Nov 2004

    0

    lol

    i find this quite hilarious...

    bad karma to those who disrespect their experienced elders (jobs)

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed