toggle

AAPL Stock: 562.29 ( -3.03 )

Jobs not implicated in stock irregularities

updated 11:50 am EDT, Fri August 4, 2006

Jobs not implicated


Following Apple's after-hours announcement on Thursday, one analyst believes that Apple CEO Steve Jobs is not liable for recently discovered stock irregularities and that any impact on its financial status will be minor. While Apple has not been formally charged by the SEC and has the company received a formal inquiry, American Technology Research (AmTech) senior analyst Shaw Wu was not surprised by the update. "We continue to believe that even in the worst case scenario where Apple is found guilty of improper options granting, we do not believe Steve Jobs is liable, the reason being the compensation committee at Apple is run by an independent board that is not comprised of employees of Apple," Wu wrote in a research note obtained by MacNN. The firm maintains a "buy" rating on Apple shares with a price target of $75.

Wu anticipates a minor impact to GAAP financials, but said that stock compensation at Apple is not a large component relative to its earnings and compared to most other technology companies.

"At the present time, the three members of the compensation committee are Bill Campbell, Mickey Drexler, and former Vice President Al Gore," Wu said. "There is no change in our fundamental opinion on Apple."

Apple initiated the internal investigation in late June, saying that it had discovered irregularities related to the issuance of certain stock option grants made between 1997 and 2001, one of which was given to company CEO Steve Jobs, but was later cancelled and resulted in no financial gain to the executive.

Apple falls on probe worries

Apple shares fell as much as 4 percent the day following the announcement, despite reassurance from analysts that the probe would not significantly impact the iPod-maker.

"We believe potential financial damage [and] penalties from any options irregularities are likely to be limited and cash flow would not be impacted," UBS analyst Benjamin Reitzes said in late June. "According to the company's 2004 proxy statement, in March 2003, Mr. Jobs voluntarily cancelled all of his outstanding options, excluding those granted to him in his capacity of director."

Lawsuits filed

Apple announced in early July that it had been notified of derivative lawsuits filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the Superior Court for Santa Clara County, making claims against former officers and directors with respect to the company's stock option grant awards. The investor suit named top Apple executives, including CEO Steve Jobs and executive officer Michael Spindler, along with other high-level management.

SEC, Feds prepare to charge

The chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission announced in mid-July that federal securities regulators had begun preparing to file charges in the case against Apple for backdating of stock options.

Prosecutors and the SEC were probing several companies whose executives received options in company stock at low prices just before big jumps in share prices. Backdating is comprised of both civil and criminal components, including forging documents and lying to boards and investors. The SEC will handle civil charges, while the Justice Department as well as the San Francisco-based U.S. Attorney's Office have launched their own criminal investigations.


by MacNN Staff

(6)

TAGS :

 Investor
toggle

Comments

  1. ZinkDifferent

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2005

    0

    Excellent...

    Just keep making those shares drop again, stupid brokers & investors. I really enjoyed picking up my last batch at $50 and watching it return back to $68 to sell. Just waiting for it to return back to a lower point, as it will.

    Most likely after all new products announcements, and phenomenal holiday sales - that's usually a clear sign of financial disasters and Apple going down the tubes, right?

  1. testudo

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Aug 2001

    0

    Ha!

    First, as we all know, analysts are idiots and don't know anything, so by them saying Jobs should be in the clear should be a signal to Stevie-boy to high-tail it to the Caymans.

    Second, the argument is that he returned his options, therefore he's not implicated. That's not entirely true. He exchanged his options for actual stock (not a one-for-one swap, but at the time, was a sweet-heart deal for Jobs, since the options weren't worth that much). So Jobs still benefitted from the stock options, and could be held liable for the associated difference.

  1. MacnnGregor

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Apr 2004

    0

    I agree zinkie

    A 4% drop on warning of possible stock irregularities!? Man, brokers bought like madmen when it was Enron! The stockmarket is a good indicator of the opinion of people with a lot of money, lots of time, who generally run scared and only give passing glance at fundamentals when it comes to bluechips.

  1. Terrin

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2006

    0

    Silliness

    testudo:

    What Jobs did or did not do is likely irrelevant to whether or not he would be liable in a lawsuit. He could have benefitted from the error and still be in the clear. That is because CEO's are allowed to rely on experts to make decisions. If Jobs relied reasonably on an expert to hand out the options, he would be legally in the clear. Since SEC rules are complex, Jobs would not be expected to know the rules personally.

    Moreover, even if Steve was found liable, he would have had to intentionally try to defraud shareholders in order to have to pay back Apple anything. Instead, his indemnification insurance that Apple provides would have to pay.

    Essentially, the people suing Apple are only suing to get Apple to sue Apple's Board. Since, the Board is not going to authorize a suit upon itself, the shareholders have to go to court to have a court force the board to approve such a lawsuit. Any damages recovered will not go to the shareholders, but to Apple.

  1. Senbei

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2004

    0

    ???

    What Jobs did or did not do is likely irrelevant to whether or not he would be liable in a lawsuit. He could have benefitted from the error and still be in the clear. That is because CEO's are allowed to rely on experts to make decisions. If Jobs relied reasonably on an expert to hand out the options, he would be legally in the clear. Since SEC rules are complex, Jobs would not be expected to know the rules personally.

    Whoa. CEO's have something called fiduciary responsibilities and are CEO's because they are supposed to be on top of such critical aspects of the corporation they are overseeing. Yes, he may have executives in charge of that but as CEO, they are supposed to be briefed on SEC regulations; CEO's also ultimately sign off on such critical details anyway and thus bear some responsibility. Ignorance at the CEO level does not fly and there was precedent set by the WorldCom trial when Bernie Ebbers claimed ignorance (which the jury did not buy; more so since he was shown to be a hands on micromanager; which is similar to Jobs management style).

  1. grener

    Banned

    Joined: Jul 2006

    0

    qs

    i3r | i3r1 | i3r2 | i3r3 | i3r4 | i3r5 | i3r6 | i3r7 | i3r8 | i3r9 | i3r10 | i3r11 | i3r12 | i3r13 | i3r14 | i3r15 | i3r16 | i3r17 | i3r18 | i3r19 | i3r20 | i3r21 | i3r22 | i3r23 | i3r24 | i3r25 | i3r26 | i3r27 | i3r28 | i3r29 | i3r30 | i3r31 | i3r32 | i3r33 |

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented