06/28/2006, 10:35am, EDT
Wednesday, June 28th
Secrecy helps, hurts Apple
"What's more, Apple insisted H-P work on iPods under tight security, even though Apple's versions in some cases were already sitting on store shelves," according to the report. "For reasons including the secrecy issue, H-P terminated its Apple deal last August."
The report notes that Apple provides different code names to different departments to help track down any leaks and that it also keeps disclosure lists about who is briefed on each product. The report also says that when employees receive documents containing sensitive information about unannounced products, the documents are often watermarked with the recipient's name--a practice that is meant to discourage carelessness.
Filed under: Apple
,
, 3
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
I completely understand Apple's predilection for secrecy. As opposed to the commoditized Windows PC industry, their innovation is what drives their sales and they have been burned many times by leaks that rob enthusiasm at best, and at worst lead to stolen ideas.
But I think it is a mistake if they are also using this to give their direct sales an advantage over their partners.