tech industry
06/12/2006, 11:00am, EDT
Monday, June 12th
Mac mini gets Core 2 Duo chip
One Mac user has replaced the standard CPU in a Mac mini with a Core 2 Duo Merom running at 2.16GHz, and has posted benchmarks in a Taiwanese forum. The modified Mini beat out both a dual 1.8GHz G5 and a dual 2.5GHz G5 in an iTunes MP3 to AAC conversion, according to macenstein, despite the Mac mini's slower hard drive. A 26 action test in Photoshop 7 reveals positive results for Apple's low-end desktop system, especially since Photoshop requires Rosetta to translate PPC its instructions for the Intel-based chip. The CPU upgrade may be the easiest in Apple's history, according to the report, because the newer Intel chips run cooler than their predecessors.
Filed under: industry
,
, 8
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
Uh, they're also available in far greater quantities and as a result are significantly less expensive (cost to performance) than most others (if not all) in Apple's history. Admittedly, the mini form factor neccessitates the use of low-heat chips, but IMO the factors listed above are more compelling.
Perhaps, (I know I'm going out on a limb here) the poster was one of those people.
First, what in the world does the fact that intel's newer chips running cooler have to do with an easy upgrade? Talk about a stupid comment there.
Second, to get to the chip in the mini, you have to puddy knife off the lid, unscrew several screws, disconnect a wire, flip over an assembly. Apple has, in the past, used ZIF sockets (or the like) in their computers. And their towers, while not the greatest in the past, were sure easier to disassemble and replace. Hell, swapping out a G3 with a G4 in my Beige G3 was simply lift a lever, pop out the G3, and plug in the G4.
Swapping a G3 for a G4 in your Beige G3 was in fact switching architectures, daughter boards, and worked because the case was roomy and well ventilated. These things are not the case with the iMac. Best upgrade possibility ever.
There's more to an upgrade than just the physical actions of replacing hardware bits, for starters. A lot of hardware upgrades involve firmware and/or software changes, and even those that do not may require fiddling with hardware to get full funtionality.
When or if there are problems subsequent to making the upgrade, diagnosis might be simple, or it might be almost impossible. And upgrade, like the one described, certainly doesn't suffer from the new parts stressing the system more than the original parts.
It wasn't a stupid comment, even if it wasn't utterly transparently clear to you, perhaps.
Yes, the old G3/G4 systems were easy to work on; I've upgraded several of them at work and at home.
As long as you avoided problems like forgetting to update firmware, reinstalling heatsinks improperly, not setting dip switches correctly (especially on some of the early upgrades), etc etc etc. I never had any trouble, but I know that some others had problems ranging from erratic operation to creating expensive doorstops.
It's nice that you never have problems (oh, wait...), it's no excuse to be abusive responding to someone else.