toggle

AAPL Stock: 423.31 ( -8.46 )

http://www.macnn.com/articles/06/05/10/ars.reviews.aperture.11/

Ars Technica reviews Aperture 1.1

updated 11:05 am EDT, Wed May 10, 2006

 

Ars reviews Aperture 1.1


Ars Technica has reviewed Aperture 1.1, the update to Apple's post-production photography software that originally failed to perform as expected for most of its target audience. Aperture 1.1's high-quality RAW processing is testament to Apple's ability to move quickly in areas where it has little experience, while its discount/refund assures users won't be expected to beta test at their own expense, according to Ars. "While I'm still left wanting on the filter quality side, Aperture 1.1.1 finally gets me excited about the prospect of doing complex imaging on the GPU via Core Image." Users no longer need to sacrifice quality to get true pixel accuracy, and while Aperture's filters could use some improvement, the job is small compared to what has already been accomplished in just a few months' time. "Aperture 1.1 is everything that Apple should have released for 1.0 and at $300, it's hard to say no now to this program."


by MacNN Staff

Post tools:

TAGS :

 Graphics/Web Design
toggle

Comments

  1. corsair

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Sep 2005

    0

    good review...again

    I remember when Mac fanboys ripped on the Ars reviewer for allegedly not knowing what he was talking about in the 1.0 review, despite the fact that so many other reviewers agreed. If he was so wrong, why did Apple have to cut price by 40% and fix everything he complained about? Sometimes you need to relax and listen to the truth, Mac fanboys.

    (I am pro-Mac, just anti-fundamentalist-Steve-worshippers.)

  1. misterdna

    Junior Member

    Joined: Aug 2004

    0

    WTF?

    Gotta love your straw argument. Anyone you define as a Mac fanboy will, by definition, defend Apple beyond reason. So why bother with this post bashing those who actions are pre-supposed by the title you give them?

  1. cebritt

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Mar 2000

    0

    Version 1.0 = beta

    Version 1.0 of any program from any company is just the final beta. They used to say that you should never release a program until you had the next version almost finished. I'm sure that's what Apple did so that's why they got 1.1 out so fast.

  1. christophersj

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2003

    0

    Not just "bugs" but maj

    Right Cebritt, people do say that, but in this case I think that there were a couple of issues that actually made the software unusable for the high end professional market it was intended for. Now it looks like those are taken care of and "normal" improvements can happen for each forthcoming version.

    At the new price, I will probably buy it now.

    -Christopher

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Logitech FabricSkin Keyboard Folio for iPad

Since the fourth-generation iPad didn't evolve much over its predecessor, the market for iPad accessories has remained somewhat static ...

Huawei Ascend Mate

The Huawei Ascend Mate is a phone that fits the screen-size gap between the 4 to 5-inch smartphone and the seven-inch or more tablet, ...

MaxUpgrades MaxConnect for 2006-2008 Mac Pro

Nobody outside of Cupertino's privileged bunch knows the future of the Mac Pro line for sure. Despite Apple's reluctance to tell us wh ...

toggle

Most Commented